Home Phone comparison Infinix Note 60 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra - Which is better?

Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra

84 out 100
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
VS
94 out 100
Vivo X300 Ultra
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra

Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Note 60 Ultra Manufactured in April, 2026, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, vs Vivo X300 Ultra, Manufactured in April, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 60 Ultra
  • Lighter design: 220g vs 232g
  • Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6600mAh
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Larger display: 6.82in
  • Higher pixel density: 510ppi
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Supports Dolby Atmos

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Infinix Note 60 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
vs
Vivo X300 Ultra

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 in 6.82 in
Resolution 1208x2644 pixels 1440x3168 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 19.8:9
Pixel density 429 ppi 510 ppi
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes
Max brightness 1600 nits 1800 nits
HDR support Yes, HDR10 Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 240 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1 % 90.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 162.37 mm (6.39 in) 162.98 mm (6.42 in)
Width 77.17 mm (3.04 in) 76.81 mm (3.02 in)
Thickness 7.9 mm (0.31 in) 8.49 mm (0.33 in)
Weight 220 g (7.76 oz) 232 g (8.18 oz)
Water resistance IP64 IP69
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel Metal Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Black
- Silver
- Blue
- Red		 - Black
- Silver
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Display Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
90.1 %
Vivo X300 Ultra
90.3 %

Performance

Testing Infinix Note 60 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8400 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
Max Frequency 3250 MHz 4600 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A725)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725)		 - 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance)
- 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 880 Hexagon
Graphics Mali-G720 MP7 n/a
GPU Cores 896 n/a
GPU Frequency 1300 MHz n/a
FLOPS 2329.6 GFLOPS n/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
1624
Vivo X300 Ultra
3621
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
6706
Vivo X300 Ultra
10653
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)16243621
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)670610653
Geekbench Compute (GPU)12192n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Infinix Note 60 Ultra], [Vivo X300 Ultra]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
1989585
Vivo X300 Ultra
4247433
CPU6146511192014
GPU6518281543938
Memory301044525105
UX422062986376
NanoReview Score19895854247433

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 5333 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 16 Android 16
UI Skin XOS 16 OriginOS 6

Battery

Volume 7000 mAh 6600 mAh
Max Charging Power 100 W 100 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (50 W) Yes (40 W)
Reverse Charging Yes, (Wireless) Yes
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 18 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 0:48 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 200 MP 200 MP
Zoom Optical, 3.5x Optical, 3.7x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 240 fps (1080p) 240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 112 ° 116 °
Lenses count Standard: 200 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP		 Standard: 200 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Main lens
Matrix200 MP200 MP
Aperturef/1.7f/1.9
Focal length23 mm35 mm
Sensorn/aSony LYT-901
Sensor size1/1.4 (0.71)1/1.12 (0.89)
Pixel size0.56 μm0.7 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusLaser autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix50 MP200 MP
Aperturef/2.9f/2.7
Focal length80 mm85 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung ISOCELL HPB
Sensor size1/2.76 (0.36)1/1.4 (0.71)
Pixel size0.64 μm0.56 μm
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix8 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.0
Focal length15 mm14 mm
SensorGalaxyCore GC08A8Sony LYT-818
Sensor size1/4 (0.25)1/1.28 (0.78)
Pixel size1.12 μm1.22 μm
StabilizationDigitalOptical

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution n/a 8192x6144 pixels
Aperture f/2.2 f/2.5
Focal length n/a 24 mm
Sensor n/a Samsung ISOCELL JN1
Sensor size n/a 1/2.76 (0.36)
Pixel size n/a 0.64 μm
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos No Yes

Other

Class Mid-range Flagship
Announced March, 2026 yr March, 2026 yr
Release Date April, 2026 yr April, 2026 yr
MSRP ($) n/a 1199
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes, 100 W Yes, 80 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below