Infinix Smart 8 vs Xiaomi Redmi 17 5G
45
out 100
VS
60
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Smart 8 Manufactured in November, 2023, with display 6.6 with chipsetUnisoc T606, vs Xiaomi Redmi 17 5G, Manufactured in August, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Smart 8
- Higher pixel density: 267ppi
- Lighter design: 184g vs 232g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 17 5G
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 5
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/64 GB - 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 4/256 GB - 6/128 GB - 6/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 254 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 825 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 86.1 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) | 170.12 mm (6.7 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 78.42 mm (3.09 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 184 g (6.49 oz) | 232 g (8.18 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Eco Leather |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gold - Green |
- Black - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.6 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 32 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 83.2 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 380 | 973 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1343 | 2241 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 450 | n/a |
| CPU | 74960 | 252111 |
| GPU | 22653 | 36217 |
| Memory | 78027 | 148946 |
| UX | 60480 | 182499 |
| NanoReview Score | 236120 | 619773 |
| Writing score | 8241 | n/a |
| Web score | 7007 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4255 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5238 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 7156 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | Android Go | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 3:15 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4128x3096 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | No |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.06 (0.33) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.1 |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1234578202828B384140) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2023 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 100 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 190 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi 17 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
