Infinix Smart 8 Pro vs Infinix Note 40 Pro
45
out 100
VS
57
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Infinix Smart 8 Pro Manufactured in February, 2024, with display 6.6 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G36, vs Infinix Note 40 Pro, Manufactured in March, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Infinix Smart 8 Pro
- Lighter design: 189g vs 190g
Reasons to choose Infinix Note 40 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 393ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/256 GB - 8/128 GB |
8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1612 pixels | 1080x2436 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 267 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 1300 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | 360 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.1 % | 90.9 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 7.75 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP54 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gold - Blue |
- Gold - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G36 | MediaTek Helio G99 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A53) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Yes |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | 128 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 240 | 727 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 848 | 2010 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 1471 |
| CPU | 50494 | 131122 |
| GPU | 13003 | 71195 |
| Memory | 44645 | 106312 |
| UX | 32799 | 116430 |
| NanoReview Score | 140941 | 425059 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 8 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | Android Go | XOS 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 70 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (20 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes (50% in 20 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 3:15 h | 0:41 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Quad LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.08 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Depth: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung SK5HM2SP03 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.67 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | CMOS | GalaxyCore GC32E1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM B2|3|5|8 | GSM B2|3|5|8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1|2|4|5|8 | WCDMA B1|5|8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1358384041) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | March, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2024 yr | March, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 120 | 250 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes 70 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Infinix Note 40 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
