Itel itel S25 Ultra vs OnePlus 13s
Compared 2 smartphones : Itel itel S25 Ultra Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetUnisoc T620, vs OnePlus 13s, Manufactured in June, 2025with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Itel itel S25 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Lighter design: 163g vs 185g
Reasons to choose OnePlus 13s
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5850mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5
- Supports DisplayPort
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.32 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 1216x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1400 nits | 1600 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.2 mm (6.46 in) | 150.8 mm (5.94 in) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) | 71.7 mm (2.82 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | n/a |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Purple |
- Black - Green - Pink |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T620 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 4320 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 830 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 497 | 2850 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1541 | 8710 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 599 | n/a |
| CPU | 101047 | 505480 |
| GPU | 30281 | 1119738 |
| Memory | 116778 | 441596 |
| UX | 84809 | 397273 |
| NanoReview Score | 332915 | 2464087 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | n/a | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | itel OS 14.5 | OxygenOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5850 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Macro Depth |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 24 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-700 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung JN5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.75 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2. |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Flagship |
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 140 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 650 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus 13s the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0