Itel itel S25 Ultra vs Oppo Find X9s Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Itel itel S25 Ultra Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetUnisoc T620, vs Oppo Find X9s Pro, Manufactured in May, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Itel itel S25 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Lighter design: 163g vs 198g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9s Pro
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7025mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.1 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.32 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 pixels | 1216x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 393 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1400 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | No | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.1 % | 90.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.2 mm (6.46 in) | 150.5 mm (5.93 in) |
| Width | 74.6 mm (2.94 in) | 71.7 mm (2.82 in) |
| Thickness | 6.9 mm (0.27 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 163 g (5.75 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Gray - Purple |
- White - Gray - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc T620 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 32 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 497 | 3302 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1541 | 10598 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 599 | n/a |
| CPU | 101047 | 975847 |
| GPU | 30281 | 1334740 |
| Memory | 116778 | 388222 |
| UX | 84809 | 641387 |
| NanoReview Score | 332915 | 3340196 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | n/a | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | itel OS 14.5 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7025 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2.8x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Macro Depth |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.4 (0.71) |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 65 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 15 mm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 21 mm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 6.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | n/a |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Budget | Flagship |
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 140 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 780 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 18 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9s Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0