LG V60 ThinQ vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
Compared 2 smartphones : LG V60 ThinQ Manufactured in June, 2020, with display 6.8 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G, Manufactured in December, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G200 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose LG V60 ThinQ
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 395ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 195g vs 214g
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | POLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.77 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 pixels | 1080x2392 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 395 ppi | 388 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.4 % | 89.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 169.3 mm (6.67 in) | 163.2 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 77.6 mm (3.06 in) | 76.3 mm (3 in) |
| Thickness | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 214 g (7.55 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP65 |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Blue |
- Black - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | MediaTek Helio G200 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 2840 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 698 | Yes |
| Graphics | Adreno 650 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 64 |
| GPU Frequency | 587 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1202.1 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1229 | 734 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3382 | 2008 |
| CPU | 232044 | 139717 |
| GPU | 198128 | 65836 |
| Memory | 130839 | 124991 |
| UX | 182486 | 117387 |
| NanoReview Score | 743497 | 447931 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 23 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 3855 | n/a |
| Writing score | 14453 | n/a |
| Web score | 7816 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5624 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 8256 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 10890 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | LG UX | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 25 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (80% in 60 min) | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 1:45 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 08:13 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 13:20 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:44 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 100 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9000x7000 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 118 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung Bright S5KGW1 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.72 | 1/4 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 12 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | 1/4 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 10 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3872x2592 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 30 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.1 | 1/3 (0.33) |
| Pixel size | 1.22 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, AVRCP, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 700 / 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 / 2600 / 2300 / 2500 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B700/B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) | n/a |
| LTE category | 22 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2020 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2020 yr | December, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 799 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0