Motorola Edge 60 Fusion vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra
Compared 2 smartphones : Motorola Edge 60 Fusion Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.67 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400, vs Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra, Manufactured in July, 2024 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Motorola Edge 60 Fusion
- Lighter design: 161g vs 211g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5500mAh vs 5200mAh
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB - 24/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | POLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.67 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1220x2712 pixels | 1220x2712 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 446 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1500 nits | 4000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 480 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 91.4 % | 89.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 161 mm (6.34 in) | 160.4 mm (6.31 in) |
| Width | 73 mm (2.87 in) | 75.1 mm (2.96 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 161 g (5.68 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Eco Leather | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Green - Pink - Purple |
- White - Black - Green - Orange - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 655 | MediaTek APU 790 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 512 GFLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1077 | 2224 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3187 | 7415 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 15810 |
| CPU | 221402 | 502823 |
| GPU | 149391 | 855638 |
| Memory | 201922 | 428947 |
| UX | 166012 | 362173 |
| NanoReview Score | 738727 | 2149581 |
| Stability | n/a | 70 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 80 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 13463 |
| Writing score | n/a | 17583 |
| Web score | n/a | 15413 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6546 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 14781 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 15188 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 12 GB - 16 GB - 24 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | Hello UI | HyperOS 1.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5200 mAh | 5500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 68 W | 120 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (86% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 12 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:44 h | 0:24 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:20 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 16:38 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:04 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 98 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | n/a | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-700C | Sony IMX906 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3280x2460 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | Omnivision OV20B |
| Sensor size | 1/3.14 | 1/2.0 |
| Autofocus | No | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | n/a |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | April, 2025 yr | July, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2025 yr | July, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 360 |
| MSRP ($) | 350 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 120 W |
Note
Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra:
Also known as Redmi K70 Extreme Edition in China.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi K70 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0