Motorola Moto G (2025) vs Motorola Moto G75 5G
56
out 100
VS
66
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Motorola Moto G (2025) Manufactured in January, 2025, with display 6.7 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300, vs Motorola Moto G75 5G, Manufactured in October, 2024 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Motorola Moto G (2025)
- Lighter design: 193g vs 208g
Reasons to choose Motorola Moto G75 5G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 387ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 720x1604 pixels | 1080x2388 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 263 ppi | 387 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | n/a | 1000 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85 % | 86.5 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 167.05 mm (6.58 in) | 166.09 mm (6.54 in) |
| Width | 76.3 mm (3 in) | 77.24 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.16 mm (0.32 in) | 8.44 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Water resistance | Yes | IP68 |
| Back panel | Eco Leather | Eco Leather |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue |
- Gray - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 710 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1072 MHz | 940 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 771 | 1017 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2012 | 2888 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 2294 |
| CPU | 128284 | 212243 |
| GPU | 68788 | 119809 |
| Memory | 95908 | 135687 |
| UX | 118179 | 153177 |
| NanoReview Score | 411159 | 620916 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14 |
| UI Skin | Hello UI | Hello UI |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 30 W | 30 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 25 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:30 h | 1:17 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony LYT-600 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.5 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8 | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B39/B40/B41/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2025 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2025 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 199 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 299 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 30 W |
Note
Motorola Moto G75 5G:
The plastic version of the smartphone is thinner (8.34), and lighter (205 grams).
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Motorola Moto G75 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
