Motorola Moto G Power (2025) vs Motorola G Pure
Compared 2 smartphones : Motorola Moto G Power (2025) Manufactured in February, 2025, with display 6.8 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300, vs Motorola G Pure, Manufactured in October, 2021 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G25. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Motorola Moto G Power (2025)
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 385ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Motorola G Pure
- Lighter design: 188g vs 208g
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/128 GB | 3/32 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | TFT LCD |
| Size | 6.8 in | 6.5 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.9:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 385 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | n/a | 550 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.2 % | 80.7 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.62 mm (6.56 in) | 167.4 mm (6.59 in) |
| Width | 77.1 mm (3.04 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 8.72 mm (0.34 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 188 g (6.63 oz) |
| Water resistance | Yes | IP52 |
| Back panel | Eco Leather | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Green |
Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Helio G25 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
- 4/1.5 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 128 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 1072 MHz | 650 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 41.8 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 778 | 473 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2010 | 1521 |
| CPU | 145282 | 56155 |
| GPU | 70029 | 11408 |
| Memory | 113291 | 43893 |
| UX | 125151 | 45747 |
| NanoReview Score | 453753 | 157203 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 |
| UI Skin | Hello UI | Stock Android |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 30 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (15 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:30 h | 2:30 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 4000x3000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | No |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | 2560x1960 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B39/B40/B41/B48/B66/B71) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B25/B26/B38/B40/B41/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | n/a | 4 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | January, 2025 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2025 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 299 | 160 |
| Sensors | - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | No | Yes 10 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Motorola Moto G Power (2025) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0