Motorola Moto G55 vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C
Compared 2 smartphones : Motorola Moto G55 Manufactured in September, 2024, with display 6.49 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7025, vs Xiaomi Redmi 9C, Manufactured in September, 2020 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G35. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Motorola Moto G55
- Higher pixel density: 405ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 182g vs 196g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 9C
- Larger display: 6.53in
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 2/32 GB - 2/64 GB - 3/32 GB - 3/64 GB - 3/128 GB - 4/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.49 in | 6.53 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 405 ppi | 269 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 560 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.2 % | 81.1 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 99.8 % | 92.9 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 17120 Hz |
| Response time | 28 ms | 47 ms |
| Contrast | 2420:1 | 881:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.56 mm (6.36 in) | 164.9 mm (6.49 in) |
| Width | 73.82 mm (2.91 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.09 mm (0.32 in) | 9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Water resistance | Yes | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Green - Purple |
- Gray - Blue - Green - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes rear |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | MediaTek Helio G35 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | No |
| Graphics | IMG BXM-8-256 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| GPU Cores | 144 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 680 MHz |
| FLOPS | 274 GFLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1021 | 479 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2430 | 1522 |
| CPU | 158235 | 54580 |
| GPU | 29954 | 17708 |
| Memory | 113626 | 37174 |
| UX | 140556 | 32494 |
| NanoReview Score | 442371 | 141956 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 2 GB - 3 GB - 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | - 32 GB - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) |
| OS Size | n/a | 18 GB |
| UI Skin | Hello UI | MIUI 12 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 30 W | 10 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (54% in 30 min) | No |
| Full Charge Time | 1:14 h | 2:59 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 4128x3096 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | No |
| Wide-angle lens | 118 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
Bokeh effect |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 28 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | 2560x1960 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | Micro USB |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 1 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | n/a | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM B2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20) |
| LTE category | 18 | 4 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | June, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2024 yr | September, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 249 | 110 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 30 W | n/a |
Note
Motorola Moto G55:
The eco-leather version is thicker at 8.19 and weighs 3 grams more than the plastic one.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Motorola Moto G55 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0