Motorola Moto G75 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
66
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Motorola Moto G75 5G Manufactured in October, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, vs Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, Manufactured in September, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Motorola Moto G75 5G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- Higher pixel density: 400ppi
- Lighter design: 197g vs 208g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/64 GB - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS TFT |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.6 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 pixels | 1080x2408 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1000 nits | 450 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5 % | 82.7 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.9 % |
| Response time | n/a | 22 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | 1442:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 166.09 mm (6.54 in) | 165.4 mm (6.51 in) |
| Width | 77.24 mm (3.04 in) | 76.9 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.44 mm (0.33 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 208 g (7.34 oz) | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Back panel | Eco Leather | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gray - Blue - Green |
- White - Black - Blue - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 710 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1017 | 895 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2888 | 1943 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2294 | n/a |
| CPU | 212243 | 152613 |
| GPU | 119809 | 80451 |
| Memory | 135687 | 79577 |
| UX | 153177 | 104748 |
| NanoReview Score | 620916 | 417389 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 43.9 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 7 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 1197 |
| Writing score | n/a | 12734 |
| Web score | n/a | 9116 |
| Video editing | n/a | 4801 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 8549 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 10034 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 4 GB - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| UI Skin | Hello UI | One UI 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 30 W | 25 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (15 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 25 min) | Yes (58% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:17 h | 1:08 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 10:23 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 15:03 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:45 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 134 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8160x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 13 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | GalaxyCore 5035 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 25 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | GalaxyCore |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 2/3/5/8 | GSM 850 MHz, 900 MHz, 1800 MHz, 1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/5/8 | UMTS Band I (2100), Band II (1900), Band IV (1700/2100), Band V (850), Band VIII (900) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B12/B13/B20/B25/B26/B38/B39/B40/B41/B46/B48/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | n/a | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | August, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | October, 2024 yr | September, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 300 |
| MSRP ($) | 299 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 30 W | No |
Note
Motorola Moto G75 5G:
The plastic version of the smartphone is thinner (8.34), and lighter (205 grams).
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Motorola Moto G75 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
