Home Phone comparison Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco F7 - Which is better?

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F7

88 out 100
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
VS
84 out 100
Xiaomi Poco F7
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Xiaomi Poco F7

Compared 2 smartphones : Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Xiaomi Poco F7, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Larger display: 7in
  • Higher pixel density: 464ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz
  • Lighter design: 199g vs 215.7g
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Poco F7
  • Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 4700mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.4
  • Infrared port

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco F7
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
vs
Xiaomi Poco F7

Display

Display quality comparison
Type POLED AMOLED
Size 7 in 6.83 in
Resolution 1224x2912 pixels 1280x2772 pixels
Aspect ratio 22:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 464 ppi 447 ppi
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness n/a 1700 nits
HDR support Yes Dolby Vision Yes Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz 480 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 87.3 % 90.1 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
1492 nits
Xiaomi Poco F7
1534 nits

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 171.48 mm (6.75 in) 163.1 mm (6.42 in)
Width 73.99 mm (2.91 in) 77.9 mm (3.07 in)
Thickness 7.19 mm (0.28 in) 8.2 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 199 g (7.02 oz) 215.7 g (7.61 oz)
Water resistance IP48 IP68
Cooling system Vapor chamber Vapor chamber
Back panel n/a Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Green
- Red		 - White
- Black
- Silver
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
87.3 %
Xiaomi Poco F7
90.1 %

Performance

Testing Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Xiaomi Poco F7 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
Max Frequency 4320 MHz 3210 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2)
Architecture - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M))
- 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L))		 - 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720)
- 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon Hexagon
Graphics Adreno 830 Adreno 825
GPU Cores 1536 1024
GPU Frequency 1100 MHz 1150 MHz
FLOPS 3379.2 GFLOPS 2355.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
2936
Xiaomi Poco F7
n/a
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
8883
Xiaomi Poco F7
n/a
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2936n/a
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)8883n/a
Geekbench Compute (GPU)24419n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Motorola Razr 60 Ultra]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
2571210
Xiaomi Poco F7
n/a
CPU525838n/a
GPU1106299n/a
Memory486155n/a
UX452918n/a
NanoReview Score2571210n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 16 GB 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 5333 MHz 4800 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 512 GB
- 1024 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0UFS 4.1
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
OS Size 1 GB n/a
UI Skin Hello UI HyperOS 2.0

Battery

Volume 4700 mAh 6500 mAh
Max Charging Power 68 W 90 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (30 W) No
Reverse Charging Yes (Wireless) Yes
Fast Charging Yes (78% in 30 min) Yes (90% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:45 h 0:39 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
27:28
Xiaomi Poco F7
25:50
Web Browsing12:54 h10:04 h
Video Playback17:04 h14:33 h
Games06:07 h07:02 h
Standby Mode115 h130 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 240 fps (1080p) 960 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 122 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.5
Focal length24 mm26 mm
Sensorn/aSony IMX882
Sensor size1/1.561/1.95
Pixel size1 μm0.8 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length12 mm15 mm
Sensorn/aOmnivision OV08F
Pixel size0.6 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 20 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.2
Focal length n/a 25 mm
Sensor n/a Omnivision OV20B
Sensor size n/a 1/4.0
Pixel size 0.64 μm 0.7 μm
Autofocus n/a No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 6.0
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version n/a 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*12
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM Moden/aDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G Bandsn/aGSM B3/B5/B8
3G BandsWCDMA 1/2/4/5/8WCDMA B1/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66/B71)LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced April, 2025 yr June, 2025 yr
Release Date April, 2025 yr June, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 1299 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 399
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 68 W Yes 90 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below