Motorola Razr 60 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

64 out 100

VS

80 out 100

Compared 2 smartphones : Motorola Razr 60 Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.9 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400X, vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE, Manufactured in September, 2025 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 2400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages

Reasons to choose Motorola Razr 60

Larger display: 6.9in
Higher pixel density: 413ppi
Lighter design: 188g vs 190g

Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Higher battery capacity: 4900mAh vs 4500mAh
Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
Supports DisplayPort

Versions

Available versions and configurations

Memory Options

- 8/256 GB
- 12/512 GB

- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB
- 8/512 GB

Review

Key Specs Motorola Razr 60 and Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Display

Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness

Motorola Razr 60

91

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

87

Camera

Main & front camera tests

Motorola Razr 60

71

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

82

Performance

App & system performance

Motorola Razr 60

40

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

78

Games

3D gaming performance

Motorola Razr 60

30

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

84

Battery

Battery life, charging speed & type

Motorola Razr 60

56

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

77

Connectivity

Connectivity features

Motorola Razr 60

80

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

84

NanoReview Score

Overall score by NanoReview

Motorola Razr 60

64

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

80

Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.

Customize your score

Function

Importance (Weight)

Display:

Camera:

Performance:

Gaming:

Battery:

Connectivity:

Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Display

Display quality comparison

Type	POLED	Dynamic AMOLED
Size	6.9 in	6.7 in
Resolution	1080x2640 pixels	1080x2340 pixels
Aspect ratio	22:9	19.5:9
Pixel density	413 ppi	385 ppi
Refresh rate	120 Hz	120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate	Yes (1-120 Hz)	Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness	1200 nits	1300 nits
HDR support	Yes HDR10+	Yes, HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate	300 Hz	n/a
Screen-to-body ratio	85 %	89.2 %
Features	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming	- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display

Peak brightness (auto)

Motorola Razr 60

1190 nits

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison

Height	171.3 mm (6.74 in)	161.3 mm (6.35 in)
Width	73.99 mm (2.91 in)	76.6 mm (3.02 in)
Thickness	7.25 mm (0.29 in)	7.4 mm (0.29 in)
Weight	188 g (6.63 oz)	190 g (6.7 oz)
Water resistance	IP48	IP68
Cooling system	n/a	Vapor chamber
Back panel	Eco Leather	Glass
Frame	Metal	Metal
Colors	- Gray - Blue - Green	- White - Black - Gray - Blue - Yellow
Fingerprint sensor	Yes In-Button	Yes, In-Display

Screen-to-body ratio

Motorola Razr 60

85 %

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

89.2 %

Performance

Testing Motorola Razr 60 and Samsung Galaxy S25 FE In benchmarks

Chipset	MediaTek Dimensity 7400X	Samsung Exynos 2400
Max Frequency	2600 MHz	3200 MHz
CPU Cores	8 (4 + 4)	10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)
Architecture	- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78)	- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520) - 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720) - 2/2.9 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4)
Process	TSMC	Samsung
Transistor Size	4 nm	4 nm
Neural Processor	MediaTek APU 655	Yes
Graphics	Mali-G615 MP2	Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU Cores	256	768
GPU Frequency	1000 MHz	1095 MHz
FLOPS	512 GFLOPS	3406.8 GFLOPS

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)

Motorola Razr 60

783

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

2116

Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)

Motorola Razr 60

2559

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

7035

Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)	783	2116
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)	2559	7035
Geekbench Compute (GPU)	3185	18270

Sources: Geekbench v6 [Motorola Razr 60], [Samsung Galaxy S25 FE]

AnTuTu 10

Motorola Razr 60

708424

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

1801002

CPU	224809	429356
GPU	179080	715844
Memory	132205	352083
UX	172330	303719
NanoReview Score	708424	1801002

Memory

RAM Size	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency	2133 MHz	n/a
Channels	2	4

Storage Capacity	256 GB	128 GB
Storage Type	UFS 2.2	UFS 4.0
Memory Card	No	No

Software

OS	Android 15	Android 16
OS Size	n/a	23.8 GB
UI Skin	Hello UI	One UI 8.0

Battery

Volume	4500 mAh	4900 mAh
Max Charging Power	30 W	45 W
Battery Type	Li-Po	Li-ion
Removable	No	No
Wireless Charging	Yes (15 W)	Yes (25 W)
Reverse Charging	Yes (Wireless)	Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging	Yes (61% in 30 min)	Yes (65% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time	0:55 h	n/a

Battery Life

Motorola Razr 60

15:31

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

n/a

Web Browsing	07:02 h	n/a
Video Playback	11:44 h	n/a
Games	04:09 h	n/a
Standby Mode	55 h	n/a

Main camera

Matrix	50 MP	50 MP
Photo resolution	8192x6144 pixels	8160x6120 pixels
Zoom	Digital	Optical, 3x
Flash	LED	LED
Stabilization	Optical	Optical
8K Recording	No	Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording	Yes (Up to 30 fps)	Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording	Yes (Up to 60 fps)	Yes (Up to 120 fps)
Slow Motion	n/a	960 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens	120 °	123 °
Lenses count	Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP	Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 8 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP
Features	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode	- Bokeh effect - Pro mode

Matrix	50 MP	50 MP
Aperture	f/1.7	f/1.8
Focal length	25 mm	24 mm
Sensor	Samsung ISOCELL GN8	n/a
Sensor size	1/1.95	1/1.57
Pixel size	0.8 μm	1 μm
Autofocus	Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)	Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
Stabilization	Optical	Optical

Matrix	n/a	8 MP
Aperture	n/a	f/2.4
Focal length	n/a	75 mm
Sensor size	n/a	1/4.4
Pixel size	n/a	1 μm
Stabilization	n/a	Optical

Matrix	13 MP	12 MP
Aperture	f/2.2	f/2.2
Focal length	n/a	13 mm
Sensor	Sony IMX258	n/a
Sensor size	1/3.0	1/3.0
Pixel size	1.12 μm	1.12 μm
Stabilization	Digital	Digital

Front camera

Matrix	32 MP	12 MP
Photo resolution	6528x4896 pixels	n/a
Aperture	f/2.4	f/2.2
Focal length	25 mm	26 mm
Sensor	OmniVision OV32B	CMOS
Sensor size	1/3.14	1/3.2
Pixel size	0.7 μm	1.12 μm
Autofocus	No	No
Stabilization	Digital	Digital
Video resolution	2160p (4K) at 30 fps	2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor	No	No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version	Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)	Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display	- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version	5.4	5.4
Bluetooth features	LE	LE
USB type	USB Type-C	USB Type-C
USB version	2	3.2
USB features	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG	- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG
DisplayPort	No	Yes
GPS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS	- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC
NFC*	Yes	Yes
Infrared Port	No	No

SIM Count*	1	1
SIM Type	Nano	Nano
SIM Mode	n/a	Dual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *	Yes	Yes
Hybrid Slot	No	No
2G Bands	GSM 850/900/1800/1900	GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900
3G Bands	WCDMA 1/2/4/5/8	UMTS B1(2100), B2(1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8(900)
LTE Bands*	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B39/B40/B41/B48/B66/B71)	LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66)
LTE category	n/a	20
5G Support	Yes	Yes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack	No	No
FM Radio	No	No
Dolby Atmos	Yes	Yes

Other

Class	Flagship	Flagship
Announced	April, 2025 yr	September, 2025 yr
Release Date	April, 2025 yr	September, 2025 yr
MSRP ($)	799	649
Sensors	- Hall Sensor - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor	- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included	No	No

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy S25 FE the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?

Motorola Razr 60

0 (0%)

Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

0 (0%)

Total Votes: 0

Motorola Razr 60 vs Samsung Galaxy S25 FE

Key Differences

Versions

Review

Tests & specs

Display

Design & Build

Performance

Memory

Software

Battery

Main camera

Front camera

Connectivity

Sound

Other

Results

Survey

User comments