Home Phone comparison Motorola Razr 60 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE - Which is better?

Motorola Razr 60 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE

64 out 100
Motorola Razr 60
VS
76 out 100
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
Motorola Razr 60
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE

Compared 2 smartphones : Motorola Razr 60 Manufactured in April, 2025, with display 6.9 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400X, vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetSamsung Exynos 2400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Motorola Razr 60
  • Larger display: 6.9in
  • Higher battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 4000mAh
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
  • Higher pixel density: 426ppi
  • Lighter design: 187g vs 188g
  • Supports DisplayPort

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/512 GB		 - 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Motorola Razr 60 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Motorola Razr 60
vs
Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE

Display

Display quality comparison
Type POLED Dynamic AMOLED
Size 6.9 in 6.7 in
Resolution 1080x2640 pixels 1080x2640 pixels
Aspect ratio 22:9 22:9
Pixel density 413 ppi 426 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 1200 nits 1600 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes, HDR10+
Touch Sampling Rate 300 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 85 % 85.4 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Motorola Razr 60
1190 nits
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 171.3 mm (6.74 in) 165.1 mm (6.5 in)
Width 73.99 mm (2.91 in) 71.9 mm (2.83 in)
Thickness 7.25 mm (0.29 in) 6.9 mm (0.27 in)
Weight 188 g (6.63 oz) 187 g (6.6 oz)
Water resistance IP48 IP48
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Eco Leather Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - Gray
- Blue
- Green		 - White
- Black
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes, In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Motorola Razr 60
85 %
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
85.4 %

Performance

Testing Motorola Razr 60 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 7400X Samsung Exynos 2400
Max Frequency 2600 MHz 3200 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (4 + 4) 10 (1 + 2 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78)		 - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A520)
- 3/2.6 (Cortex-A720)
- 2/2.9 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4)
Process TSMC Samsung
Transistor Size 4 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek APU 655 Yes
Graphics Mali-G615 MP2 Samsung Xclipse 940
GPU Cores 256 768
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 1095 MHz
FLOPS 512 GFLOPS 3406.8 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Motorola Razr 60
783
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
1930
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Motorola Razr 60
2559
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
6276
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)7831930
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)25596276
Geekbench Compute (GPU)318513485
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Motorola Razr 60], [Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Motorola Razr 60
708424
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
1781862
CPU224809423151
GPU179080681568
Memory132205376105
UX172330301038
NanoReview Score7084241781862

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 8 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz n/a
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB128 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 4.0
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 15 Android 16
OS Size n/a 29.5 GB
UI Skin Hello UI One UI 8.0

Battery

Volume 4500 mAh 4000 mAh
Max Charging Power 30 W 25 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (15 W) Yes (15 W)
Reverse Charging Yes (Wireless) Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes (61% in 30 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 0:55 h n/a
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Motorola Razr 60
15:31
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
n/a
Web Browsing07:02 hn/a
Video Playback11:44 hn/a
Games04:09 hn/a
Standby Mode55 hn/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8160x6120 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens 120 ° 123 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 13 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 12 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.7f/1.8
Focal length25 mm23 mm
SensorSamsung ISOCELL GN8n/a
Sensor size1/1.951/1.57
Pixel size0.8 μm1 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocus (Dual Pixel)Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel)
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix13 MP12 MP
Aperturef/2.2f/2.2
Focal lengthn/a13 mm
SensorSony IMX258n/a
Sensor size1/3.01/3.2
Pixel size1.12 μm1.12 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 10 MP
Photo resolution 6528x4896 pixels 3648x2736 pixels
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 25 mm 23 mm
Sensor OmniVision OV32B n/a
Sensor size 1/3.14 1/3.0
Pixel size 0.7 μm 1.22 μm
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 n/a
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*11
SIM TypeNanoNano
eSIM Support *YesYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900GSM (850/900/1800/1900)
3G BandsWCDMA 1/2/4/5/8WCDMA (850/1700/1900/2100)
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B39/B40/B41/B48/B66/B71)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced April, 2025 yr July, 2025 yr
Release Date April, 2025 yr July, 2025 yr
MSRP ($) 799 899
Sensors - Hall Sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Hall Sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included No No
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below