OnePlus Ace 5 Racing vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
Compared 2 smartphones : OnePlus Ace 5 Racing Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 6.77 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400e, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G, Manufactured in August, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose OnePlus Ace 5 Racing
- Lighter design: 200g vs 211g
- Higher battery capacity: 7100mAh vs 7000mAh
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 15 Pro 5G
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 443ppi
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.77 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 pixels | 1220x2772 pixels |
| Pixel density | 387 ppi | 443 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1300 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7 % | 86.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.58 mm (6.44 in) | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 76.02 mm (2.99 in) | 78.1 mm (3.07 in) |
| Thickness | 8.17 mm (0.32 in) | 7.8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 200 g (7.05 oz) | 211 g (7.44 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP64 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Frame | n/a | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Green |
- White - Black - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400e | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultra |
| Max Frequency | 3400 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 790 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2250 | 1029 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7452 | 2915 |
| CPU | 468076 | 224809 |
| GPU | 881160 | 179080 |
| Memory | 402890 | 132205 |
| UX | 372630 | 172330 |
| NanoReview Score | 2124756 | 708424 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 7100 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 240 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | n/a | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 8 MP |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 20 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2025 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider OnePlus Ace 5 Racing the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0