Oppo A54 vs Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G
36
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo A54 Manufactured in April, 2021, with display 6.51 with chipsetMediatek Helio P35, vs Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G, Manufactured in March, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo A54
- Higher pixel density: 269ppi
- Lighter design: 192g vs 193g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G
- Larger display: 6.88in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5200mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
Versions
| Memory Options | - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
- 3/64 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.51 in | 6.88 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 720x1640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 269 ppi | 260 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.7 % | 85.8 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.6 mm (6.44 in) | 171.17 mm (6.74 in) |
| Width | 75.7 mm (2.98 in) | 77.8 mm (3.06 in) |
| Thickness | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) | 8.26 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX4 | No |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- Black - Gold - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53) - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | No | No |
| Graphics | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 32 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | 54.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 479 | 441 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1522 | 1496 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 708 |
| CPU | 53877 | 91026 |
| GPU | 18570 | 30797 |
| Memory | 37818 | 75780 |
| UX | 37294 | 66310 |
| NanoReview Score | 147559 | 263913 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 4 GB - 6 GB |
- 3 GB - 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 11) | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 11.1 | Android Go |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 18 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (30% in 40 min) | Yes (23% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 2:25 h | 2:30 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4160x3120 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 90 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 13 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 32 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 13 MP | 32 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3L6 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4624x3468 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.06 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, HID, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | No |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | GSM 2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 1/5/8 | WCDMA B1/5/82G |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | Yes | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | March, 2021 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2021 yr | March, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 160 | 129 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi A5 4G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
