Oppo A6 Pro 5G vs Motorola Moto G17
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo A6 Pro 5G Manufactured in September, 2025, with display 6.57 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300, vs Motorola Moto G17, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81 Extreme. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo A6 Pro 5G
- Higher pixel density: 397ppi
- Lighter design: 185g vs 195g
- Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5200mAh
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Motorola Moto G17
- Larger display: 6.72in
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.57 in | 6.72 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2372 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 397 ppi | 392 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1400 nits | 1050 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.8 % | 86.5 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 158.2 mm (6.23 in) | 165.7 mm (6.52 in) |
| Width | 75.02 mm (2.95 in) | 76 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8 mm (0.31 in) | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold - Blue - Purple |
Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Helio G81 Extreme |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76) |
- 6/1.7 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 64 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 1072 MHz | 820 MHz |
| FLOPS | 137.2 GFLOPS | 78.7 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 786 | 401 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2038 | 1298 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1420 | n/a |
| CPU | 146180 | 77335 |
| GPU | 137592 | 41704 |
| Memory | 139053 | 72554 |
| UX | 128493 | 72850 |
| NanoReview Score | 551318 | 264443 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 6 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | n/a |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | n/a |
Battery
| Volume | 7000 mAh | 5200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:46 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.0 (0.5) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | n/a | 5 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 19 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/5.0 (0.2) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.1 (0.32) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | n/a |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | September, 2025 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2025 yr | January, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 250 | 149 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 80 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo A6 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0