Oppo A96 vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo A96 Manufactured in March, 2022, with display 6.59 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680, vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo A96
    Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    • Larger display: 6.78in
    • Higher pixel density: 429ppi
    • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
    • Lighter design: 178g vs 191g
    • Higher battery capacity: 6150mAh vs 5000mAh
    • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
    • Supports Dolby Atmos
    • Infrared port

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 6/128 GB
    - 8/128 GB
    - 8/256 GB
    - 8/256 GB
    - 12/256 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Oppo A96 and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    vs

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type LTPS LCD AMOLED
    Size 6.59 in 6.78 in
    Resolution 1080x2412 pixels 1208x2644 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
    Pixel density 401 ppi 429 ppi
    Refresh rate 90 Hz 144 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (60-120 Hz)
    Max brightness 480 nits n/a
    HDR support No Yes, HDR10
    Touch Sampling Rate 180 Hz n/a
    Screen-to-body ratio 84.2 % 90.3 %
    Features DCI-P3 - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    Display test
    Peak brightness (auto)
    Oppo A96
    n/a
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    2398 nits

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 164.4 mm (6.47 in) 162.4 mm (6.39 in)
    Width 75.7 mm (2.98 in) 77 mm (3.03 in)
    Thickness 8.4 mm (0.33 in) 7.4 mm (0.29 in)
    Weight 191 g (6.74 oz) 178 g (6.28 oz)
    Water resistance IPX4 IP69
    Back panel Plastic Glass
    Frame Plastic Plastic
    Colors - Black
    - Blue
    - Black
    - Blue
    - Orange
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes, In-Display
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Oppo A96
    84.2 %
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    90.3 %

    Performance

    Testing Oppo A96 and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
    Max Frequency 2400 MHz 2600 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (4 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
    Architecture - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53))
    - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73))
    - 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
    - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78)
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 6 nm 4 nm
    Neural Processor Hexagon 686 MediaTek APU 655
    Graphics Adreno 610 Mali-G615 MP2
    GPU Cores 128 256
    GPU Frequency 1114 MHz 1100 MHz
    FLOPS 284 GFLOPS 665.6 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Oppo A96
    415
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    1035
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Oppo A96
    1411
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    2980
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)4151035
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)14112980
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Oppo A96
    319875
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    799033
    CPU108407255071
    GPU40492185764
    Memory96607173375
    UX74369184823
    NanoReview Score319875799033
    3DMark Wild Life
    3DMark Wild Life
    Oppo A96
    447
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    n/a
    Stability99 %n/a
    Graphics Test2 fpsn/a
    Graphics Score447n/a
    PCMark 3.0
    PCMark 3.0
    Oppo A96
    6941
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    n/a
    Writing score8711n/a
    Web score6249n/a
    Video editing3670n/a
    Data manipulation5946n/a
    NanoReview Score6941n/a

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 6 GB
    - 8 GB
    8 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
    Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
    Channels 2 2
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 128 GB
    - 256 GB
    256 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 2.2
    Memory CardMicroSDNo

    Software

    OS Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) Android 16
    UI Skin ColorOS 13 HIOS 16

    Battery

    Volume 5000 mAh 6150 mAh
    Max Charging Power 33 W 45 W
    Battery Type Li-Po Li-Po
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging Yes Yes
    Fast Charging Yes (50% in 26 min) Yes (42% in 30 min)
    Full Charge Time 1:15 h 1:20 h
    Battery Life Test
    Battery Life
    Oppo A96
    n/a
    Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
    27:15
    Web Browsingn/a11:44 h
    Video Playbackn/a21:09 h
    Gamesn/a06:57 h
    Standby Moden/a100 h

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8160x6144 pixels
    Zoom Digital Optical, 3x
    Flash LED Dual LED
    Stabilization Digital Optical
    8K Recording No No
    4K Recording No No
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
    Wide-angle lens n/a 112 °
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Depth: 2 MP
    Standard: 50 MP
    Telephoto: 50 MP
    Ultra-wide: 8 MP
    Features - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP50 MP
    Aperturef/1.8f/1.8
    Focal length27 mm23 mm
    Sensorn/aSony LYT-700C
    Sensor sizen/a1/1.56 (0.64)
    Pixel sizen/a1 μm
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationDigitalOptical
    Telephoto
    Matrixn/a50 MP
    Aperturen/af/2.4
    Focal lengthn/a70 mm
    Sensor sizen/a1/2.88 (0.35)
    Pixel sizen/a0.61 μm
    Stabilizationn/aDigital
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrixn/a8 MP
    Aperturen/af/2.2
    Focal lengthn/a14 mm
    Sensor sizen/a1/4.0 (0.25)
    Pixel sizen/a1.12 μm
    Stabilizationn/aDigital

    Front camera

    Matrix 16 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution n/a 8160x6144 pixels
    Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
    Focal length 26 mm 21 mm
    Sensor CMOS CMOS
    Sensor size n/a 1/2.76 (0.36)
    Pixel size n/a 0.64 μm
    Autofocus No No
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
    Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5 5.3
    Bluetooth features LE LE
    USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort n/a No
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Beidou
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    NFC* Varies by region Yes
    Infrared Port No Yes
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoNo
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900n/a
    3G BandsWCDMA B1/B5/B8n/a
    LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41)n/a
    LTE category12n/a
    5G SupportNoYes

    Sound

    Speakers Stereo n/a
    3.5 mm Jack Yes No
    FM Radio Yes Yes
    Dolby Atmos No Yes

    Other

    Class Mid-range Mid-range
    Announced March, 2022 yr March, 2026 yr
    Release Date March, 2022 yr March, 2026 yr
    Launch Price ($) 280 n/a
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 33 W Yes, 45 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 50 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    0 (0%)
    Total Votes: 0

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below