Oppo A98 vs Oppo A96
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo A98 Manufactured in May, 2023, with display 6.72 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Oppo A96, Manufactured in March, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo A98
- Larger display: 6.72in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 5
Reasons to choose Oppo A96
- Higher pixel density: 401ppi
- Lighter design: 191g vs 192g
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/256 GB | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | LTPS LCD | LTPS LCD |
| Size | 6.72 in | 6.59 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 401 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 680 nits | 480 nits |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 180 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.5 % | 84.2 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) | 164.4 mm (6.47 in) |
| Width | 76.1 mm (3 in) | 75.7 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 192 g (6.77 oz) | 191 g (6.74 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IPX4 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
- 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 619 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| FLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS | 284 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 904 | 415 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2115 | 1411 |
| CPU | 148338 | 108407 |
| GPU | 83427 | 40492 |
| Memory | 98664 | 96607 |
| UX | 120107 | 74369 |
| NanoReview Score | 450536 | 319875 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 2 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 447 |
| Writing score | 13148 | 8711 |
| Web score | 9089 | 6249 |
| Video editing | 3912 | 3670 |
| Data manipulation | 7965 | 5946 |
| NanoReview Score | 9483 | 6941 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 13.1 | ColorOS 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 18 min) | Yes (50% in 26 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:44 h | 1:15 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9000x7000 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 120 fps (720p) | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 27 mm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 18 | 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2023 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 320 | 280 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo A98 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0