Oppo Find N5 vs Oppo Realme 9 Pro
85
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find N5 Manufactured in February, 2025, with display 8.12 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, vs Oppo Realme 9 Pro, Manufactured in February, 2022 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find N5
- Larger display: 8.12in
- Higher pixel density: 412ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5600mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme 9 Pro
- Lighter design: 195g vs 229g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 8.12 in | 6.6 in |
| Resolution | 2248x2480 pixels | 1080x2412 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 412 ppi | 400 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1400 nits | 460 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | n/a |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.4 % | 84.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
DCI-P3 |
| sRGB gamut | 98.8 % | 97.6 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 3 ms | 30 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 1230:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.87 mm (6.33 in) | 164.3 mm (6.47 in) |
| Width | 146.58 mm (5.77 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 4.21 mm (0.17 in) | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 229 g (8.08 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Water resistance | IPX8 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Purple |
- Black - Blue - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.53 (Oryon (Phoenix M)) - 2/4.32 (Oryon (Phoenix L)) |
- 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 6 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 686 |
| Graphics | Adreno 830 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3035 | 902 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8256 | 2015 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24653 | n/a |
| CPU | 470983 | 153370 |
| GPU | 361578 | 82989 |
| Memory | 129812 | 91816 |
| UX | 383296 | 126540 |
| NanoReview Score | 1645669 | 454715 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 45.8 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 7 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 1211 |
| Writing score | n/a | 15353 |
| Web score | n/a | 8485 |
| Video editing | n/a | 4073 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7727 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 9964 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 5333 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) |
| OS Size | 54 GB | 17 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | Realme UI 4.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 33 W |
| Battery Type | Li-ion | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (72% in 30 min) | Yes (52% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:52 h | 1:15 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:37 h | 10:59 h |
| Video Playback | 13:13 h | 14:55 h |
| Games | 06:01 h | 06:21 h |
| Standby Mode | 137 h | 125 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 9280x6920 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | n/a |
| Wide-angle lens | 116 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-700C | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.7 | n/a |
| Focal length | 75 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | Omnivision OV08D10 |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/4 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | 4920x3264 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX471 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.13 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | n/a | 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2025 yr | February, 2022 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2025 yr | February, 2022 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 320 |
| Sensors | - Hall Sensor - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes 33 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find N5 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
