Oppo Find X5 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S8

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X5 Pro Manufactured in March, 2022, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, vs Samsung Galaxy S8, Manufactured in April, 2017 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X5 Pro
  • Larger display: 6.7in
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Built-in eSIM
  • Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S8
  • Higher pixel density: 570ppi
  • Lighter design: 155g vs 218g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
4/64 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo Find X5 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S8
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED Super AMOLED
Size 6.7 in 5.8 in
Resolution 1440x3216 pixels 1440x2960 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 18.5:9
Pixel density 525 ppi 570 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 60 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes No
Max brightness 500 nits 540 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ Yes HDR10
Touch Sampling Rate 240 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 89.5 % 84.2 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Always-On Display
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Oppo Find X5 Pro
759 nits
Samsung Galaxy S8
614 nits
sRGB gamut98.1 %99.8 %
PWM (Flicker)361 Hz250 Hz
Response time1 ms4.4 ms
Contrast∞ Infinite∞ Infinite

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 163.7 mm (6.44 in) 148.9 mm (5.86 in)
Width 73.9 mm (2.91 in) 68.1 mm (2.68 in)
Thickness 8.5 mm (0.33 in) 8 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 218 g (7.69 oz) 155 g (5.47 oz)
Water resistance IP68 IP68
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel Ceramic Glass
Frame Metal Metal
Colors - White
- Black
- Blue
- Black
- Silver
- Gold
- Gray
- Blue
- Red
- Pink
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes rear
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Find X5 Pro
89.5 %
Samsung Galaxy S8
84.2 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Find X5 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S8 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 8895
Max Frequency 3000 MHz 2300 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510)
- 3/2.5 (Cortex-A710)
- 1/3 (Cortex-X2)
- 4/1.69 (Cortex-A53)
- 4/2.314 (Exynos M2)
Process Samsung Samsung
Transistor Size 4 nm 10 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon No
Graphics Adreno 730 Mali-G71 MP20
GPU Cores 1024 320
GPU Frequency 818 MHz 546 MHz
FLOPS 1675.3 GFLOPS 375 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Find X5 Pro
1447
Samsung Galaxy S8
519
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Find X5 Pro
3778
Samsung Galaxy S8
1563
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1447519
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)37781563
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Find X5 Pro
1032280
Samsung Galaxy S8
377103
CPU243873107990
GPU421754116534
Memory14960484213
UX21704968366
NanoReview Score1032280377103
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Find X5 Pro
9495
Samsung Galaxy S8
n/a
Max Surface Temp.39.7 °Cn/a
Stability63 %n/a
Graphics Test56 fpsn/a
Graphics Score9495n/a
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Oppo Find X5 Pro
11926
Samsung Galaxy S8
n/a
Writing score17288n/a
Web score9549n/a
Video editing5920n/a
Data manipulation9478n/a
NanoReview Score11926n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 8 GB
- 12 GB
4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 1794 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity- 256 GB
- 512 GB
64 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1UFS 2.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 12.1 (Upgradeable to Android 14) Android 7.0 (Upgradeable to Android 9.0)
OS Size 24.1 GB 11.7 GB
UI Skin ColorOS 12.1 One UI

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 3000 mAh
Max Charging Power 80 W 15 W
Battery Type Li-Po Li-ion
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (50 W) Yes Qi/PMA
Reverse Charging Yes (Wireless) No
Fast Charging Yes (91% in 30 min) Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (40% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 0:40 h 1:45 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Oppo Find X5 Pro
19:51
Samsung Galaxy S8
16:58
Web Browsing08:01 h06:26 h
Video Playback13:05 h10:09 h
Games05:30 h04:05 h
Standby Mode88 h85 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 12 MP
Photo resolution 8700x5800 pixels 4000x3000 pixels
Zoom Optical, 2x Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion 480 fps (720p) 240 fps (720p)
Wide-angle lens 110 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 13 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Standard: 12 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support
Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP12 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.7
Focal length25 mm26 mm
SensorSony IMX766Sony IMX333
Sensor size1/1.561/2.55
Pixel size1 μm1.4 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix13 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.4n/a
Focal length52 mmn/a
SensorSamsung S5K3M5n/a
Sensor size1/3.4n/a
Pixel size1 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.2n/a
Focal length15 mmn/a
SensorSony IMX766n/a
Sensor size1/1.56n/a
Pixel size1 μmn/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a
Main camera DxOMark results
Photo quality
Oppo Find X5 Pro
130
Samsung Galaxy S8
88
Video quality
Oppo Find X5 Pro
126
Samsung Galaxy S8
88
Overall camera score
Oppo Find X5 Pro
130
Samsung Galaxy S8
88
Bokeh65n/a
Preview70n/a
Zoom127n/a

Front camera

Matrix 32 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 6560x4928 pixels 3264x2448 pixels
Aperture f/2.4 f/1.7
Focal length 21 mm 25 mm
Sensor Sony IMX709 Samsung S5K3H7
Sensor size 1/2.74 1/3.6
Pixel size 0.8 μm 1.22 μm
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1440p at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No
Selfie camera DxOMark results
Photo quality
Oppo Find X5 Pro
119
Samsung Galaxy S8
86
Video quality
Oppo Find X5 Pro
113
Samsung Galaxy S8
107

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
Bluetooth version 5.2 5
Bluetooth features LE PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.1 3.1
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- USB-Host mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes n/a
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port No No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoYes
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHzGSM 850, GSM 900, GSM 1800, GSM 1900
3G BandsUMTS 1/2/4/5/6/8/19HSDPA 850, HSDPA 900, HSDPA 1900, HSDPA 2100
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66)LTE (B700/B800/B850/B900/B1700/B1800/B1900/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600)
LTE category2016
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

Speakers Stereo Mono
3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Oppo Find X5 Pro
89.2 dB
Samsung Galaxy S8
82.4 dB

Other

Class Flagship Flagship
Announced February, 2022 yr March, 2017 yr
Release Date March, 2022 yr April, 2017 yr
Launch Price ($) 1390 720
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
- Barometer
- Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 80 W n/a
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X5 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below