Oppo Find X5 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T
71
out 100
VS
46
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X5 Pro Manufactured in March, 2022, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, vs Xiaomi Redmi 9T, Manufactured in January, 2021 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X5 Pro
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher pixel density: 525ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi 9T
- Lighter design: 198g vs 218g
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB - 6/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.53 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 pixels | 1080x2340 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 525 ppi | 395 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5 % | 83.4 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
n/a |
| sRGB gamut | 98.1 % | 96.4 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 361 Hz | 880 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 42 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | 1868:1 |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.7 mm (6.44 in) | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 73.9 mm (2.91 in) | 77.3 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 9.6 mm (0.38 in) |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Ceramic | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- Gray - Blue - Green - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 |
| Max Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.5 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3 (Cortex-X2) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 260 Silver (Cortex-A53)) - 4/2 (Kryo 260 Gold (Cortex-A73)) |
| Process | Samsung | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 11 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 683 |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | Adreno 610 |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | 128 |
| GPU Frequency | 818 MHz | 950 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1675.3 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1447 | 511 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3778 | 1551 |
| CPU | 243873 | 89386 |
| GPU | 421754 | 34918 |
| Memory | 149604 | 60894 |
| UX | 217049 | 61570 |
| NanoReview Score | 1032280 | 247218 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 39.7 °C | 45.3 °C |
| Stability | 63 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 56 fps | 2 fps |
| Graphics Score | 9495 | 373 |
| Writing score | 17288 | 6932 |
| Web score | 9549 | 5529 |
| Video editing | 5920 | 3683 |
| Data manipulation | 9478 | 5170 |
| NanoReview Score | 11926 | 6197 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 4 GB - 6 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 64 GB - 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 12.1 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 10 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | 24.1 GB | 21 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 12.1 | MIUI 14 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (91% in 30 min) | Yes (25% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:40 h | 2:30 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:01 h | 11:57 h |
| Video Playback | 13:05 h | 15:26 h |
| Games | 05:30 h | 06:05 h |
| Standby Mode | 88 h | 175 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8700x5800 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 110 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Depth: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Samsung S5KGM1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 13 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 52 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3M5 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/3.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | OmniVision OV8856 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 65 | n/a |
| Preview | 70 | n/a |
| Zoom | 127 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6560x4928 pixels | 3264x2448 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, HID, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - USB-Host mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM B2/3/5/8 |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 20 | 13 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Budget |
| Announced | February, 2022 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2022 yr | January, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 1390 | 180 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X5 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
