Oppo Find X6 Pro vs Oppo Find X2 Pro
84
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X6 Pro Manufactured in March, 2023, with display 6.82 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, vs Oppo Find X2 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2020 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X6 Pro
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4260mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 513ppi
- Lighter design: 207g vs 218g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.82 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 pixels | 1440x3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.8:9 |
| Pixel density | 510 ppi | 513 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 2500 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.5 % | 88.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.2 % | 100 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 120 Hz | 480 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 2.6 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.8 mm (6.49 in) | 165.2 mm (6.5 in) |
| Width | 76.2 mm (3 in) | 74.4 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 9.1 mm (0.36 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 218 g (7.69 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP68 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Ceramic |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Green - Brown |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 |
| Max Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 2 + 2 + 3) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 3/2 (Cortex-A510) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Adreno 740 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 587 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS | 1202.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1997 | 1239 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 5297 | 3417 |
| CPU | 437983 | 147241 |
| GPU | 607388 | 192634 |
| Memory | 283058 | 131026 |
| UX | 283636 | 157653 |
| NanoReview Score | 1612065 | 628554 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 55.3 °C | 39.8 °C |
| Stability | 41 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 78 fps | 22 fps |
| Graphics Score | 13071 | 3828 |
| Writing score | n/a | 14830 |
| Web score | n/a | 7575 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5885 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7636 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 10734 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | n/a | 53 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 14 | ColorOS 13.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4260 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 65 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (64% in 10 min) | Yes SuperVOOC 2.0 Flash Charge (100% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:30 h | 0:40 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:13 h | 06:49 h |
| Video Playback | 16:47 h | 10:55 h |
| Games | 05:51 h | 04:44 h |
| Standby Mode | 106 h | 89 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2.8x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 110 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX989 | Sony IMX689 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.0 | 1/1.43 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/3.0 |
| Focal length | 65 mm | 129 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX890 | Samsung S5K3M5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | 1.6 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 17 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX890 | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 80 | n/a |
| Preview | 72 | n/a |
| Zoom | 154 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6560x4928 pixels | 6464x4864 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | Sony IMX616 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.1 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800, 1900MHz | GSM 700 / 800 / 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 1900 / 2000 / 2300 / 2500 / 2600 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B66) | LTE (B700/B800/B850/B900/B1800/B1900/B2000/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2023 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2023 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 875 | 1320 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X6 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
