Oppo Find X7 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
83
out 100
VS
65
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X7 Manufactured in January, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300, vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra, Manufactured in March, 2020 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 990. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X7
- Lighter design: 206g vs 220g
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.9in
- Higher pixel density: 511ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/128 GB - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.9 in |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 pixels | 1440x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 511 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 4500 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90.5 % | 90.6 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.2 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 6.2 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.7 mm (6.41 in) | 166.9 mm (6.57 in) |
| Width | 75.4 mm (2.97 in) | 76 mm (2.99 in) |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm (0.34 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 206 g (7.27 oz) | 220 g (7.76 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP65 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Purple - Brown |
- Black - Gray |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Samsung Exynos 990 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 3020 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.5 (Cortex-A76) - 2/2.73 (Exynos M5) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 790 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G77 MP11 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 704 |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 800 MHz |
| FLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS | 1126 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2225 | 1159 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 7438 | 3158 |
| CPU | 488894 | 220525 |
| GPU | 809566 | 225011 |
| Memory | 349022 | 146451 |
| UX | 352058 | 168329 |
| NanoReview Score | 1999540 | 760316 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 38.6 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 53 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 25 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 4320 |
| Writing score | 17595 | 13391 |
| Web score | 9404 | 8714 |
| Video editing | 5474 | 6104 |
| Data manipulation | 12671 | 9006 |
| NanoReview Score | 12670 | 11163 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | n/a | 23.7 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | One UI 5.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse Charging | n/a | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 10 min) | Yes (100% in 80 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:27 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 06:27 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 11:23 h |
| Games | n/a | 04:23 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 91 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 12032x9204 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 3x | Optical, 4x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Up to 24FPS |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 108 MP Telephoto: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 108 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-T808 | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.43 | 1/1.33 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/3.5 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 103 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 13 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5K2LA |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/2.55 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.4 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 40 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6560x4928 pixels | 7864x5200 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | Samsung S5KGH1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/2.65 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800MHz | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B66) | LTE (B850/B900/B1700/B1900/B2100) |
| LTE category | n/a | 22 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2024 yr | February, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2024 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 565 | 1400 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 100 W | n/a |
Note
Oppo Find X7:
The rear cover can be either glass or eco-leather, with a weight difference of 4 grams.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X7 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
