Oppo Find X8 Pro vs Google Pixel 7a
93
out 100
VS
68
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X8 Pro Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Google Pixel 7a, Manufactured in May, 2023 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X8 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 5910mAh vs 4385mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.3
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 7a
- Lighter design: 193.5g vs 215g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
8/128 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.1 in |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | No |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2 % | 81.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 99.7 % | 98.4 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 86 Hz | 218 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 2 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.27 mm (6.39 in) | 152 mm (5.98 in) |
| Width | 76.67 mm (3.02 in) | 72.9 mm (2.87 in) |
| Thickness | 8.24 mm (0.32 in) | 9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 193.5 g (6.83 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP67 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- White - Gray - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Google Tensor G2 |
| Max Frequency | 3630 MHz | 2850 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.35 (Cortex-A78) - 2/2.85 (Cortex-X1) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Next-gen Tensor Processing Unit |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 672 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 850 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 1142.4 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2841 | 1443 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8988 | 3493 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24839 | n/a |
| CPU | 632079 | 255576 |
| GPU | 1240236 | 325623 |
| Memory | 496917 | 149843 |
| UX | 429564 | 199394 |
| NanoReview Score | 2798796 | 930436 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 50.8 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 65 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 37 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 6343 |
| Writing score | 19468 | 15048 |
| Web score | 12038 | 7500 |
| Video editing | 5589 | 6362 |
| Data manipulation | 16248 | 10504 |
| NanoReview Score | 14649 | 10609 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 3200 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| OS Size | 17 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | Stock Android |
Battery
| Volume | 5910 mAh | 4385 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (7.5 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (20% in 36 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:53 h | 1:57 h |
| Web Browsing | 13:16 h | 08:24 h |
| Video Playback | 18:31 h | 13:40 h |
| Games | 07:16 h | 05:06 h |
| Standby Mode | 120 h | 76 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 9000x7000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 6x | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 64 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-808 | Sony IMX787 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/1.73 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | n/a |
| Focal length | 73 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Sony IMX712 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 75 | 70 |
| Preview | 78 | 69 |
| Zoom | 155 | 105 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4032x3024 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | n/a |
| Focal length | 21 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800MHz | GSM/EDGE: Quad-band (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz) |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | UMTS/HSPA+/HSDPA: Bands 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | LTE (B/B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B14/B17/B20/B25/B26/B28/B29/B30/B38/B40/B41/B48/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | May, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | May, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 899 | 499 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X8 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
