Oppo Find X8 Pro vs OnePlus 9
93
out 100
VS
63
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X8 Pro Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs OnePlus 9, Manufactured in March, 2021with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X8 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5910mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 3.1
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose OnePlus 9
- Lighter design: 192g vs 215g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.55 in |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 402 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | 500 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2 % | 87.3 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.7 % | 98.9 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 86 Hz | 323 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 13 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.27 mm (6.39 in) | 160 mm (6.3 in) |
| Width | 76.67 mm (3.02 in) | 74.2 mm (2.92 in) |
| Thickness | 8.24 mm (0.32 in) | 8.7 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 192 g (6.77 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- Black - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G |
| Max Frequency | 3630 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 680 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 680 Gold (Cortex-A78)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 680 Prime (Cortex-X1)) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 5 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | Hexagon 780 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Adreno 660 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 1024 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 840 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 1290.2 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2841 | 1489 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8988 | 3996 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24839 | n/a |
| CPU | 632079 | 248662 |
| GPU | 1240236 | 308723 |
| Memory | 496917 | 169685 |
| UX | 429564 | 210435 |
| NanoReview Score | 2798796 | 937505 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 48.8 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 55 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 34 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 5761 |
| Writing score | 19468 | 15081 |
| Web score | 12038 | 11112 |
| Video editing | 5589 | 6018 |
| Data manipulation | 16248 | 10751 |
| NanoReview Score | 14649 | 12032 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
- 8 GB - 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | - 128 GB - 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | 17 GB | 35 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | OxygenOS 13 |
Battery
| Volume | 5910 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 65 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (15 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (100% in 29 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:53 h | 0:29 h |
| Web Browsing | 13:16 h | 07:52 h |
| Video Playback | 18:31 h | 11:44 h |
| Games | 07:16 h | 04:32 h |
| Standby Mode | 120 h | 96 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 6x | Digital |
| Flash | Quad LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 140 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP Monochrome: 2 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-808 | Sony IMX689 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | 1/1.43 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 50 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | n/a |
| Focal length | 73 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | n/a |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Sony IMX766 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 75 | n/a |
| Preview | 78 | n/a |
| Zoom | 155 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 16 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 4920x3264 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | Sony IMX471 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/3.06 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - SBAS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800MHz | GSM B2, 3, 5, 8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | WCDMA B1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B30/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B46/B48/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | March, 2021 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | March, 2021 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 899 | 730 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X8 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
