Oppo Find X8 Pro vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro
93
out 100
VS
82
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X8 Pro Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400, vs Oppo Reno 14 Pro, Manufactured in May, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8450. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X8 Pro
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 14 Pro
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Lighter design: 201g vs 215g
- Higher battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 5910mAh
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 1264x2780 pixels | 1272x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | n/a |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1600 nits | 600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes Dolby Vision | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.2 % | 90.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.7 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 86 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 1 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.27 mm (6.39 in) | 163.4 mm (6.43 in) |
| Width | 76.67 mm (3.02 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.24 mm (0.32 in) | 7.5 mm (0.3 in) |
| Weight | 215 g (7.58 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue |
- White - Black - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 |
| Max Frequency | 3630 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.63 (Cortex-X925) |
- 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725) - 3/3 (Cortex-A725) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 890 | MediaTek NPU 880 |
| Graphics | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| GPU Cores | 1536 | 896 |
| GPU Frequency | 1612 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS | 2329.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2841 | 1617 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8988 | 6406 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 24839 | n/a |
| CPU | 632079 | 388482 |
| GPU | 1240236 | 610993 |
| Memory | 496917 | 375299 |
| UX | 429564 | 300733 |
| NanoReview Score | 2798796 | 1675507 |
| Writing score | 19468 | n/a |
| Web score | 12038 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5589 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 16248 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 14649 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 4266 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 17 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | ColorOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5910 mAh | 6200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | n/a |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes (Wireless) | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (70% in 30 min) | Yes (73% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:53 h | 0:53 h |
| Web Browsing | 13:16 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 18:31 h | n/a |
| Games | 07:16 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 120 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 6x | Optical, 3.5x |
| Flash | Quad LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 116 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.6 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-808 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.4 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Laser autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.6 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 73 mm | 80 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.6 μm |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 16 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | 75 | n/a |
| Preview | 78 | n/a |
| Zoom | 155 | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.6 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850, 900, 1800MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Announced | October, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 899 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 550 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X8 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
