Home Phone comparison Oppo Find X9 Pro and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra - Which is better?

Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

96 out 100
Oppo Find X9 Pro
VS
73 out 100
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Oppo Find X9 Pro
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X9 Pro Manufactured in October, 2025, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500, vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Pro
  • Higher pixel density: 450ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 6150mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.3
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
  • Lighter design: 178g vs 224g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 - 8/256 GB
- 12/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo Find X9 Pro and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Oppo Find X9 Pro
vs
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED AMOLED
Size 6.78 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1264x2780 pixels 1208x2644 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Pixel density 450 ppi 429 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (1-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness 1800 nits n/a
HDR support Yes, Dolby Vision Yes, HDR10
Touch Sampling Rate 240 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 90 % 90.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Oppo Find X9 Pro
1792 nits
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
2398 nits

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 161.26 mm (6.35 in) 162.4 mm (6.39 in)
Width 76.46 mm (3.01 in) 77 mm (3.03 in)
Thickness 8.25 mm (0.32 in) 7.4 mm (0.29 in)
Weight 224 g (7.9 oz) 178 g (6.28 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP69
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel Glass Glass
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - White
- Gray
- Red		 - Black
- Blue
- Orange
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Display Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Find X9 Pro
90 %
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
90.3 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Find X9 Pro and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 9500 MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate
Max Frequency 4210 MHz 2600 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (4 + 4)
Architecture - 4/2.7 (C1-Pro)
- 3/3.5 (C1-Premium)
- 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra)		 - 4/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 3 nm 4 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 990 MediaTek APU 655
Graphics Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 Mali-G615 MP2
GPU Cores 1536 256
GPU Frequency 1716 MHz 1100 MHz
FLOPS 5271.5 GFLOPS 665.6 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Find X9 Pro
3235
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
1035
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Find X9 Pro
9626
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
2980
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)32351035
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)96262980
Geekbench Compute (GPU)29534n/a
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo Find X9 Pro]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Find X9 Pro
3956885
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
799033
CPU1030180255071
GPU1453877185764
Memory709892173375
UX762936184823
NanoReview Score3956885799033

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 8 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 5333 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.1UFS 2.2
Memory CardNoNo

Software

OS Android 16 Android 16
UI Skin ColorOS 16 HIOS 16

Battery

Volume 7500 mAh 6150 mAh
Max Charging Power 80 W 45 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (50 W) No
Reverse Charging Yes, (Wireless) Yes
Fast Charging Yes (54% in 30 min) Yes (42% in 30 min)
Full Charge Time 1:20 h 1:20 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Oppo Find X9 Pro
35:19
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
27:15
Web Browsing19:04 h11:44 h
Video Playback25:00 h21:09 h
Games10:24 h06:57 h
Standby Mode107 h100 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8160x6144 pixels
Zoom Optical, 3x Optical, 3x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Optical
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 120 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion 480 fps (720p) n/a
Wide-angle lens 120 ° 112 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 8 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- RAW support		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.5f/1.8
Focal length23 mm23 mm
SensorSony LYT-828Sony LYT-700C
Sensor size1/1.281/1.56 (0.64)
Pixel size1.22 μm1 μm
AutofocusLaser autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalOptical
Telephoto
Matrix200 MP50 MP
Aperturef/2.1f/2.4
Focal length70 mm70 mm
SensorSamsung ISOCELL HP5n/a
Sensor size1/1.561/2.88 (0.35)
Pixel size0.5 μm0.61 μm
StabilizationOpticalDigital
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MP8 MP
Aperturef/2.0f/2.2
Focal length15 mm14 mm
SensorSamsung S5KJN5n/a
Sensor size1/2.761/4.0 (0.25)
Pixel size0.64 μm1.12 μm
StabilizationDigitalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8160x6144 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.4
Focal length 21 mm 21 mm
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.76 1/2.76 (0.36)
Pixel size 0.64 μm 0.64 μm
Autofocus Phase autofocus No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 6.0 5.3
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 3.2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort Yes No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Galileo
NFC* Yes Yes
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *YesNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800MHzn/a
3G BandsWCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19n/a
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66)n/a
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos Yes Yes

Other

Class Flagship Mid-range
Announced October, 2025 yr March, 2026 yr
Release Date October, 2025 yr March, 2026 yr
MSRP ($) 1299 n/a
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes, 80 W Yes, 45 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below