Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Find X9 Ultra Manufactured in May, 2026, with display 6.82 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, vs Google Pixel 11 Pro XL, Manufactured in August, 2026 with chipsetGoogle Tensor G6. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher pixel density: 510ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7050mAh vs 5115mAh
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Google Pixel 11 Pro XL
- Lighter design: 226g vs 235g
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.82 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 pixels | 1344x2992 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.8:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 510 ppi | 482 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 3600 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, Dolby Vision | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 300 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90 % | 89.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.16 mm (6.42 in) | 162.7 mm (6.41 in) |
| Width | 76.97 mm (3.03 in) | 76.5 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 8.65 mm (0.34 in) | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 235 g (8.29 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Green - Orange |
- Black - Blue - Green - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Google Tensor G6 |
| Max Frequency | 4600 MHz | 4110 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 7 (1 + 4 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance) - 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime) |
- 2/2.65 () - 4/3.38 () |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | Yes |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 3646 | 2677 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 11276 | 7321 |
| CPU | 1166693 | 876037 |
| GPU | 1523262 | 288736 |
| Memory | 509363 | 304202 |
| UX | 886789 | 464561 |
| NanoReview Score | 4086107 | 1933536 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 5300 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 17 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 16 | Stock Android |
Battery
| Volume | 7050 mAh | 5115 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (25 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes, (Wireless) | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (75% in 30 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:45 h | n/a |
| Web Browsing | 16:45 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 26:15 h | n/a |
| Games | 08:23 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 144 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Optical, 10x | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 120 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 240 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.5 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-901 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.12 (0.89) | 1/1.3 (0.77) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.2 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.8 |
| Focal length | 70 mm | 106 mm |
| Sensor | OmniVision OV52A | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.28 (0.78) | 1/1.95 (0.51) |
| Pixel size | 0.61 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 14 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony LYTIA-600 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 (0.51) | 1/2.51 (0.4) |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 42 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 3648x2736 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 17 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 | Sony IMX858 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.75 (0.36) | 1/2.51 (0.4) |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | Yes | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | April, 2026 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | May, 2026 yr | August, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 1299 | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 100 W | No |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0