Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Realme C71

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo K13 Turbo Pro Manufactured in July, 2025, with display 6.8 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, vs Realme C71, Manufactured in June, 2025 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
  • Larger display: 6.8in
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 6000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Realme C71
  • Lighter design: 196g vs 208g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB
- 8/128 GB
- 8/256 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro and Realme C71
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
vs

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 6.8 in 6.67 in
Resolution 1280x2800 pixels 720x1604 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Pixel density 453 ppi 264 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) No
Max brightness 1600 nits 725 nits
HDR support No No
Touch Sampling Rate 240 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3 % 85.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 162.8 mm (6.41 in) 165.8 mm (6.53 in)
Width 77.2 mm (3.04 in) 75.9 mm (2.99 in)
Thickness 8.3 mm (0.33 in) 7.79 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 208 g (7.34 oz) 196 g (6.91 oz)
Water resistance IPX9 n/a
Cooling system Active fan n/a
Back panel n/a Plastic
Frame Plastic Plastic
Colors - Black
- Silver
- Purple
- White
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Display Yes, In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
90.3 %
Realme C71
85.3 %

Performance

Testing Oppo K13 Turbo Pro and Realme C71 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 Unisoc T7250
Max Frequency 3210 MHz 1800 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720)
- 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4)
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 12 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon No
Graphics Adreno 825 Mali-G57 MP1
GPU Cores 1024 32
GPU Frequency 1150 MHz 850 MHz
FLOPS 2355.2 GFLOPS 54.4 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
2135
Realme C71
440
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
6613
Realme C71
1472
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2135440
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)66131472
Geekbench Compute (GPU)18374732
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
2050329
Realme C71
267686
CPU48846588439
GPU87999430767
Memory35867279469
UX32319869011
NanoReview Score2050329267686

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4800 MHz 1866 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB64 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
UI Skin ColorOS 15 Realme UI 6.0

Battery

Volume 7000 mAh 6000 mAh
Max Charging Power 80 W 45 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes Yes
Fast Charging Yes (63% in 30 min) Yes (50% in 36 min)
Full Charge Time 0:56 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels 8160x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion 120 fps (1080p) n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Depth: 2 MP
Standard: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
- Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Focal length27 mm27 mm
Sensor sizen/a1/2.88 (0.35)
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 16 MP 5 MP
Photo resolution 4920x3264 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2
Focal length 22 mm 27 mm
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Sensor size n/a 1/5 (0.2)
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
- Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
- Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
NFC* Yes Varies by region
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 900/1800MHzGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz
3G BandsWCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19WCDMA 1/5/8
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66)LTE (B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41)
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No No
FM Radio No No
Dolby Atmos n/a No

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced July, 2025 yr June, 2025 yr
Release Date July, 2025 yr June, 2025 yr
MSRP ($) 359 109
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
- Proximity Sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes, 80 W Yes, 45 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo K13 Turbo Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below