Home Phone comparison Oppo K13 Turbo Pro and Vivo Y19 5G - Which is better?

Oppo K13 Turbo Pro vs Vivo Y19 5G

83 out 100
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
VS
57 out 100
Vivo Y19 5G
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
Vivo Y19 5G

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo K13 Turbo Pro Manufactured in July, 2025, with display 6.8 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, vs Vivo Y19 5G, Manufactured in May, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 6300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
  • Larger display: 6.8in
  • Higher pixel density: 453ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 7000mAh vs 5500mAh
  • Infrared port
Reasons to choose Vivo Y19 5G
  • Lighter design: 199g vs 208g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/256 GB
- 16/512 GB		 - 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/128 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo K13 Turbo Pro and Vivo Y19 5G
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
vs
Vivo Y19 5G

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 6.8 in 6.74 in
Resolution 1280x2800 pixels 720x1600 pixels
Aspect ratio 19.5:9 20:9
Pixel density 453 ppi 260 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes (60-120 Hz) Yes (60-120 Hz)
Max brightness 1600 nits 570 nits
HDR support No No
Touch Sampling Rate 240 Hz n/a
Screen-to-body ratio 90.3 % 85.3 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 162.8 mm (6.41 in) 167.3 mm (6.59 in)
Width 77.2 mm (3.04 in) 76.9 mm (3.03 in)
Thickness 8.3 mm (0.33 in) 8.19 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 208 g (7.34 oz) 199 g (7.02 oz)
Water resistance IPX9 IP64
Cooling system Active fan n/a
Back panel n/a Plastic
Frame Plastic Plastic
Colors - Black
- Silver
- Purple		 - Silver
- Green
Fingerprint sensor Yes, In-Display Yes, In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
90.3 %
Vivo Y19 5G
85.3 %

Performance

Testing Oppo K13 Turbo Pro and Vivo Y19 5G In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 MediaTek Dimensity 6300
Max Frequency 3210 MHz 2400 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 2/2.02 (Cortex-A720)
- 2/2.8 (Cortex-A720)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A720)
- 1/3.21 (Cortex-X4)		 - 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2.4 (Cortex-A76)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 6 nm
Neural Processor Hexagon Yes
Graphics Adreno 825 Mali-G57 MP2
GPU Cores 1024 64
GPU Frequency 1150 MHz 1072 MHz
FLOPS 2355.2 GFLOPS 137.2 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
2135
Vivo Y19 5G
712
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
6613
Vivo Y19 5G
1897
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)2135712
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)66131897
Geekbench Compute (GPU)183741392
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo K13 Turbo Pro], [Vivo Y19 5G]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo K13 Turbo Pro
2050329
Vivo Y19 5G
450773
CPU488465150961
GPU87999449094
Memory358672142509
UX323198108209
NanoReview Score2050329450773

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4800 MHz 2133 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB64 GB
Storage TypeUFS 4.0eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
UI Skin ColorOS 15 Funtouch OS 15

Battery

Volume 7000 mAh 5500 mAh
Max Charging Power 80 W 15 W
Battery Type Silicon Carbon (Si/C) Li-ion
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No No
Reverse Charging Yes n/a
Fast Charging Yes (63% in 30 min) Yes
Full Charge Time 0:56 h n/a

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Zoom Digital Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion 120 fps (1080p) n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Depth: 2 MP		 Standard: 13 MP
Depth
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP13 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/2.2
Focal length27 mmn/a
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital

Front camera

Matrix 16 MP 5 MP
Photo resolution 4920x3264 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.4 f/2.0
Focal length 22 mm n/a
Sensor CMOS CMOS
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes No
Infrared Port Yes No
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 900/1800MHzGSM 850/900/1800 MHz
3G BandsWCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19WCDMA B1/B5/B8
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B18/B19/B26/B38/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66)LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41)
5G SupportYesYes

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos n/a No

Other

Class Mid-range Mid-range
Announced July, 2025 yr May, 2025 yr
Release Date July, 2025 yr May, 2025 yr
MSRP ($) 359 180
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes, 80 W Yes, 15 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo K13 Turbo Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below