Oppo K15 Pro Plus vs Oppo K14 Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo K15 Pro Plus Manufactured in April, 2026, with display 6.78 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500s, vs Oppo K14 Lite, Manufactured in September, 2026 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo K15 Pro Plus
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 450ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz
- Lighter design: 213g vs 215g
- Higher battery capacity: 8000mAh vs 7000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Infrared port
Reasons to choose Oppo K14 Lite
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
n/a |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.78 in | 6.75 in |
| Resolution | 1272x2772 pixels | 720x1570 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 450 ppi | 256 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 900 nits |
| HDR support | n/a | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 330 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.8 % | 85.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - DC dimming |
DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) | 166.5 mm (6.56 in) |
| Width | 77.47 mm (3.05 in) | 78.2 mm (3.08 in) |
| Thickness | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) | 9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP64 |
| Cooling system | Active fan | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | n/a | Plastic |
| Frame | Metal | Plastic |
| Colors | - Silver - Gray - Pink |
- Purple - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Unisoc T7250 |
| Max Frequency | 3730 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925) |
- 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 3 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU | No |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 2680 | 1338 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 8358 | 1380 |
| CPU | 804510 | 154091 |
| GPU | 1280281 | 21175 |
| Memory | 395484 | 101370 |
| UX | 641448 | 104938 |
| NanoReview Score | 3121723 | 381574 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 4.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 16 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 8000 mAh | 7000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 100 W | 15 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes (37% in 30 min) |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 120 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 116 ° | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 13 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 15 mm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 5 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 23 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | n/a | CMOS |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Yes | No |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | Yes |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800MHz | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA 1/5/8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Budget |
| Announced | April, 2026 yr | September, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | April, 2026 yr | September, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 510 | 180 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 100 W | Yes, 15 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo K15 Pro Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0