Oppo Realme 8 Pro vs Vivo X200s
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme 8 Pro Manufactured in March, 2021, with display 6.4 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 720G, vs Vivo X200s, Manufactured in April, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme 8 Pro
- Lighter design: 176g vs 205g
Reasons to choose Vivo X200s
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher pixel density: 460ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.4 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 409 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 430 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 180 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 83.3 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 99.9 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 114 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 7 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 160.6 mm (6.32 in) | 160.1 mm (6.3 in) |
| Width | 73.9 mm (2.91 in) | 74.29 mm (2.92 in) |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 176 g (6.21 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Yellow |
- Silver - Gray - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2300 MHz | 3730 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.3 (Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76)) |
- 4/2.4 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.3 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.73 (Cortex-X925) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 8 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 692 | MediaTek NPU 890 |
| Graphics | Adreno 618 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 1612 MHz |
| FLOPS | 384 GFLOPS | 4952.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 696 | 2949 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1842 | 9258 |
| CPU | 122880 | 587082 |
| GPU | 76972 | 1173209 |
| Memory | 82260 | 421617 |
| UX | 98370 | 470083 |
| NanoReview Score | 380482 | 2651991 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 46.9 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1050 | n/a |
| Writing score | 13121 | n/a |
| Web score | 6730 | n/a |
| Video editing | 5913 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 6887 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 9614 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
- 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 13 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 4.0 | OriginOS 5 |
Battery
| Volume | 4500 mAh | 6200 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 50 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (88% in 30 min) | Yes (70% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:39 h | 0:54 h |
| Web Browsing | 09:50 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 13:30 h | n/a |
| Games | 05:43 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 120 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 12032x9204 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 108 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP Monochrome: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 108 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KHM2 | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.52 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung JD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/3.14 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX471 | Samsung KD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.0 | 1/3.44 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | UMTS 1/5/8 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 15 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2021 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2021 yr | April, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 350 | 600 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | n/a | Yes 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200s the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0