Oppo Realme 9 Pro vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme 9 Pro Manufactured in February, 2022, with display 6.6 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, Manufactured in March, 2026 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme 9 Pro
Reasons to choose Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 429ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Lighter design: 178g vs 195g
- Higher battery capacity: 6150mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5.1
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 1208x2644 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 429 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 460 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | n/a | Yes, HDR10 |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | 97.6 % | n/a |
| Response time | 30 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1230:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.3 mm (6.47 in) | 162.4 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
- Black - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Adreno 619 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| FLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS | 665.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 902 | 1035 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2015 | 2980 |
| CPU | 153370 | 255071 |
| GPU | 82989 | 185764 |
| Memory | 91816 | 173375 |
| UX | 126540 | 184823 |
| NanoReview Score | 454715 | 799033 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 45.8 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1211 | n/a |
| Writing score | 15353 | n/a |
| Web score | 8485 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4073 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 7727 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 9964 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 17 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 4.0 | HIOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6150 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes (42% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:15 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:59 h | 11:44 h |
| Video Playback | 14:55 h | 21:09 h |
| Games | 06:21 h | 06:57 h |
| Standby Mode | 125 h | 100 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9280x6920 pixels | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 112 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Sony LYT-700C |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.88 (0.35) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.61 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Digital |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/4.0 (0.25) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | 8160x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX471 | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/3.13 | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Announced | February, 2022 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2022 yr | March, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 320 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Camon 50 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0