Oppo Realme 9 Pro vs Vivo X200 FE
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme 9 Pro Manufactured in February, 2022, with display 6.6 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 695, vs Vivo X200 FE, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme 9 Pro
- Larger display: 6.6in
Reasons to choose Vivo X200 FE
- Higher pixel density: 461ppi
- Lighter design: 186g vs 195g
- Higher battery capacity: 6500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.6 in | 6.31 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 400 ppi | 461 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 460 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | n/a | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 84.7 % | 90.3 % |
| Features | DCI-P3 | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 97.6 % | n/a |
| Response time | 30 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | 1230:1 | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.3 mm (6.47 in) | 150.8 mm (5.94 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 71.8 mm (2.83 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 8 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
- Black - Blue - Pink - Yellow |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus |
| Max Frequency | 2200 MHz | 3400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold (Cortex-A78)) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.4 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 686 | MediaTek NPU 790 |
| Graphics | Adreno 619 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 902 | 2209 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2015 | 7239 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 15299 |
| CPU | 153370 | 645427 |
| GPU | 82989 | 652697 |
| Memory | 91816 | 382399 |
| UX | 126540 | 366339 |
| NanoReview Score | 454715 | 2046862 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 45.8 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 1211 | n/a |
| Writing score | 15353 | n/a |
| Web score | 8485 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4073 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 7727 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 9964 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 15 |
| OS Size | 17 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 4.0 | Funtouch 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 33 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (52% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 19 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 1:15 h | 0:57 h |
| Web Browsing | 10:59 h | n/a |
| Video Playback | 14:55 h | n/a |
| Games | 06:21 h | n/a |
| Standby Mode | 125 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9280x6920 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | n/a | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.9 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Sony IMX921 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX882 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.95 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 8 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV08D10 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | 1/4.0 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4920x3264 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX471 | Samsung S5KKD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.13 | 1/3.44 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | Yes | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) |
| LTE category | 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | February, 2022 yr | June, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2022 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 320 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 650 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 33 W | Yes 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X200 FE the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0