Oppo Realme C30 vs Tecno Spark 40C
39
out 100
VS
55
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme C30 Manufactured in July, 2022, with display 6.5 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612, vs Tecno Spark 40C, Manufactured in August, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G81. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme C30
- Higher pixel density: 270ppi
- Lighter design: 182g vs 190g
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark 40C
- Larger display: 6.67in
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 6000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.3 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
- Fingerprint scanner
Versions
| Memory Options | - 2/32 GB - 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB |
- 4/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.5 in | 6.67 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 720x1600 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 263 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 120 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.3 % | 84.2 % |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.1 mm (6.46 in) | 165.6 mm (6.52 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 77 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.5 mm (0.33 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 182 g (6.42 oz) | 190 g (6.7 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Green |
- White - Black - Gray - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | No | Yes, In-Button |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 | MediaTek Helio G81 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 6/1.7 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 32 | 48 |
| GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | 820 MHz |
| FLOPS | 78.6 GFLOPS | 78.7 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 512 | 444 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1556 | 1372 |
| CPU | 75961 | 76856 |
| GPU | 31322 | 35386 |
| Memory | 59626 | 64168 |
| UX | 61702 | 69127 |
| NanoReview Score | 228611 | 245537 |
| Writing score | 7826 | n/a |
| Web score | 7204 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4917 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5723 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 7603 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 2 GB - 3 GB - 4 GB |
4 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 1800 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 11 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | Realme UI Go | HIOS 15.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 18 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | No |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 2:55 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 8 MP | Standard: 13 MP Depth |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2560x1960 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | n/a |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | No |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.3 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | No | Varies by region |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA Bands 1/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B3/B5/B8) | n/a |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | Yes |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Budget |
| Announced | July, 2022 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2022 yr | August, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 85 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 100 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Spark 40C the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
