Oppo Realme C75 vs Tecno Pova 7 5G
54
out 100
VS
65
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme C75 Manufactured in December, 2024, with display 6.72 with chipsetMediaTek Helio G92 Max, vs Tecno Pova 7 5G, Manufactured in July, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme C75
- Lighter design: 196g vs 207g
Reasons to choose Tecno Pova 7 5G
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 396ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Size | 6.72 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1080x2460 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 392 ppi | 396 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (60-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 690 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | No |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 86.3 % | 87.8 % |
| Features | n/a | DCI-P3 |
Design & Build
| Height | 165.69 mm (6.52 in) | 167.3 mm (6.59 in) |
| Width | 76.22 mm (3 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) | 8.9 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 196 g (6.91 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP64 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Black - Gold |
- Black - Silver - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Helio G92 Max | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultimate |
| Max Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2500 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU | MediaTek APU 655 |
| Graphics | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP2 |
| GPU Cores | 48 | 256 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 1047 MHz |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 536.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 436 | 1011 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1356 | 2813 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 1075 | 2488 |
| CPU | 58520 | 215846 |
| GPU | 40838 | 148921 |
| Memory | 59672 | 150452 |
| UX | 63939 | 157954 |
| NanoReview Score | 222969 | 673173 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 5.0 | HIOS 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 45 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (30 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (40% in 30 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | n/a | 1:09 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth |
Standard: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.88 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 8 MP | 13 MP |
| Photo resolution | 3264x2448 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28/B38/B40/B41) | n/a |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | December, 2024 yr | July, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 180 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 190 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 45 W | Yes, 45 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Tecno Pova 7 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
