Oppo Realme C33 vs Honor 400

45 out 100
Oppo Realme C33
VS
73 out 100
Honor 400

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme C33 Manufactured in September, 2022, with display 6.5 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612, vs Honor 400, Manufactured in May, 2025 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme C33
    Reasons to choose Honor 400
    • Larger display: 6.55in
    • Higher pixel density: 460ppi
    • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
    • Lighter design: 184g vs 187g
    • Higher battery capacity: 5300mAh vs 5000mAh
    • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
    • Infrared port
    • Built-in eSIM

    Versions

    Available versions and configurations
    Memory Options - 3/32 GB
    - 4/64 GB
    - 4/128 GB
    - 8/256 GB
    - 8/512 GB
    - 12/256 GB
    - 12/512 GB

    Review

    Key Specs Oppo Realme C33 and Honor 400
    Display
    Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
    Camera
    Main & front camera tests
    Performance
    App & system performance
    Games
    3D gaming performance
    Battery
    Battery life, charging speed & type
    Connectivity
    Connectivity features
    NanoReview Score
    Overall score by NanoReview
    Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
    Customize your score
    Function
    Importance (Weight)
    Display:
    Camera:
    Performance:
    Gaming:
    Battery:
    Connectivity:
    Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

    Tests & specs

    Specs & test comparison
    Smartphones:
    vs

    Display

    Display quality comparison
    Type IPS LCD AMOLED
    Size 6.5 in 6.55 in
    Resolution 720x1600 pixels 1264x2736 pixels
    Aspect ratio 20:9 19.5:9
    Pixel density 270 ppi 460 ppi
    Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
    Adaptive refresh rate No Yes
    Max brightness 400 nits n/a
    HDR support No Yes HDR10+
    Touch Sampling Rate 120 Hz n/a
    Screen-to-body ratio 82.1 % 90.2 %
    Features n/a - DCI-P3
    - Always-On Display
    - DC dimming

    Design & Build

    Design and ergonomics comparison
    Height 164.2 mm (6.46 in) 156.5 mm (6.16 in)
    Width 75.7 mm (2.98 in) 74.6 mm (2.94 in)
    Thickness 8.3 mm (0.33 in) 7.3 mm (0.29 in)
    Weight 187 g (6.6 oz) 184 g (6.49 oz)
    Water resistance No IP66
    Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
    Back panel Plastic n/a
    Frame Plastic n/a
    Colors - Gold
    - Blue
    - Black
    - Silver
    - Gold
    - Blue
    Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes In-Display
    Screen-to-body ratio
    Oppo Realme C33
    82.1 %
    Honor 400
    90.2 %

    Performance

    Testing Oppo Realme C33 and Honor 400 In benchmarks
    Processor
    Chipset Unisoc Tiger T612 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
    Max Frequency 1800 MHz 2630 MHz
    CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
    Architecture - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
    - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75)
    - 4/1.8 (Kryo Silver (Cortex-A510))
    - 3/2.4 (Kryo Gold (Cortex-A715))
    - 1/2.63 (Kryo Prime (Cortex-A715))
    Process TSMC TSMC
    Transistor Size 12 nm 4 nm
    Neural Processor n/a Yes
    Graphics Mali-G57 MP1 Adreno 720
    GPU Cores 32 512
    GPU Frequency 614 MHz 975 MHz
    FLOPS 78.6 GFLOPS 998.4 GFLOPS
    GeekBench v6
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    Oppo Realme C33
    428
    Honor 400
    1142
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    Oppo Realme C33
    1428
    Honor 400
    3180
    Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)4281142
    Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)14283180
    Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a4046
    AnTuTu 10
    AnTuTu 10
    Oppo Realme C33
    249559
    Honor 400
    854878
    CPU86258267068
    GPU22575234936
    Memory83768193158
    UX56958159716
    NanoReview Score249559854878
    3DMark Wild Life
    3DMark Wild Life
    Oppo Realme C33
    417
    Honor 400
    n/a
    Stability98 %n/a
    Graphics Test2 fpsn/a
    Graphics Score417n/a
    PCMark 3.0
    PCMark 3.0
    Oppo Realme C33
    7420
    Honor 400
    n/a
    Writing score9814n/a
    Web score6974n/a
    Video editing4641n/a
    Data manipulation5574n/a
    NanoReview Score7420n/a

    Memory

    RAM
    RAM Size - 3 GB
    - 4 GB
    8 GB
    Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
    Channels 2 4
    Storage
    Storage Capacity- 32 GB
    - 64 GB
    - 128 GB
    256 GB
    Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 3.1
    Memory CardMicroSDNo

    Software

    OS Android 12 Android 15
    UI Skin Realme UI S MagicOS 9

    Battery

    Volume 5000 mAh 5300 mAh
    Max Charging Power 10 W 66 W
    Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
    Removable No No
    Wireless Charging No No
    Reverse Charging No Yes
    Fast Charging No Yes (44% in 15 min)
    Full Charge Time 3:00 h 0:57 h

    Main camera

    Matrix 50 MP 200 MP
    Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
    Zoom Digital Digital
    Flash LED Dual LED
    Stabilization Digital Optical
    8K Recording No No
    4K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
    1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
    Slow Motion No n/a
    Wide-angle lens n/a 112 °
    Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
    Depth: 0.3 MP
    Standard: 200 MP
    Ultra-wide: 12 MP
    Features Bokeh effect - Bokeh effect
    - Pro mode
    Main lens
    Matrix50 MP200 MP
    Aperturef/1.8f/1.9
    Sensorn/aSamsung ISOCELL HP3
    Sensor sizen/a1/1.4
    Pixel sizen/a0.56 μm
    AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
    StabilizationDigitalOptical
    Ultra-wide lens
    Matrixn/a12 MP
    Aperturen/af/2.2
    Stabilizationn/aDigital

    Front camera

    Matrix 5 MP 50 MP
    Photo resolution 2560x1960 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
    Aperture f/2.2 f/2.1
    Focal length 27 mm n/a
    Sensor CMOS n/a
    Sensor size 1/5.0 n/a
    Pixel size n/a 0.64 μm
    Autofocus No Phase autofocus
    Stabilization Digital Digital
    Video resolution 720p at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 30 fps
    TOF 3D sensor No No

    Connectivity

    Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax)
    Wi-Fi features - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    - Dual Band
    - Wi-Fi MiMO
    - Wi-Fi Direct
    - Wi-Fi Hotspot
    - Wi-Fi Display
    Bluetooth version 5 5.4
    Bluetooth features LE, A2DP LE
    USB type Micro USB USB Type-C
    USB version 2 2
    USB features - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - Charging
    - USB Storage Mode
    - OTG
    DisplayPort n/a No
    GPS - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    - GPS
    - GLONASS
    - Galileo
    - QZSS
    NFC* Varies by region Yes
    Infrared Port No Yes
    Connectivity
    SIM Count*22
    SIM TypeNanoNano
    SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
    eSIM Support *NoYes
    Hybrid SlotNoNo
    2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900n/a
    3G BandsWCDMA Bands 1/5/8n/a
    LTE Bands*LTE (B/B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41)n/a
    LTE category7n/a
    5G SupportNoYes

    Sound

    Speakers Mono n/a
    3.5 mm Jack Yes No
    FM Radio n/a No
    Dolby Atmos No n/a

    Other

    Class Budget Mid-range
    Announced September, 2022 yr May, 2025 yr
    Release Date September, 2022 yr May, 2025 yr
    Launch Price ($) 140 n/a
    MSRP ($) n/a 499
    Sensors - Proximity Sensor
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Fingerprint sensor
    - Proximity Sensor
    - Gyroscope
    - Accelerometer
    - Ambient Light Sensor
    - Compass
    - Fingerprint sensor
    Charger Included Yes 10 W Yes 66 W
    * Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

    Results

    After analyzing the data, we consider Honor 400 the clear winner in this comparison.

    Survey

    Which smartphone would you pick?
    0 (0%)
    0 (0%)
    Total Votes: 0

    User comments

    Share your opinion or ask questions below