Oppo Realme C33 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme C33 Manufactured in September, 2022, with display 6.5 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T612, vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro, Manufactured in July, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme C33
- Lighter design: 187g vs 226g
Reasons to choose Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro
- Larger display: 6.83in
- Higher pixel density: 447ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 9000mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.1 vs 5
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Infrared port
Versions
| Memory Options | - 3/32 GB - 4/64 GB - 4/128 GB |
- 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 8/512 GB - 12/256 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.5 in | 6.83 in |
| Resolution | 720x1600 pixels | 1280x2772 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 270 ppi | 447 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 400 nits | n/a |
| HDR support | No | Yes, HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 120 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 82.1 % | 89.5 % |
| Features | n/a | - DCI-P3 - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 164.2 mm (6.46 in) | 163.45 mm (6.44 in) |
| Width | 75.7 mm (2.98 in) | 78.27 mm (3.08 in) |
| Thickness | 8.3 mm (0.33 in) | 8.46 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Back panel | Plastic | n/a |
| Frame | Plastic | Plastic |
| Colors | - Gold - Blue |
- White - Black - Blue - Purple |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Button | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T612 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 4 |
| Max Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (4 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.4 (Cortex-A78) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | n/a | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G57 MP1 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 32 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 614 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 78.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 428 | 1011 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 1428 | 2924 |
| CPU | 86258 | 277639 |
| GPU | 22575 | 237833 |
| Memory | 83768 | 172711 |
| UX | 56958 | 188800 |
| NanoReview Score | 249559 | 876983 |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 2 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 417 | n/a |
| Writing score | 9814 | n/a |
| Web score | 6974 | n/a |
| Video editing | 4641 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 5574 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 7420 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 3 GB - 4 GB |
8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 32 GB - 64 GB - 128 GB | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | Realme UI S | HyperOS 3 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 9000 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 10 W | 67 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes |
| Fast Charging | No | Yes |
| Full Charge Time | 3:00 h | n/a |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | No | No |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| Slow Motion | No | n/a |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Depth |
| Features | Bokeh effect | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | n/a | 26 mm |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 5 MP | 8 MP |
| Photo resolution | 2560x1960 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 27 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | CMOS | Omnivision OV08F |
| Sensor size | 1/5.0 | n/a |
| Autofocus | No | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 720p at 30 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 4 (802.11 a/b/g/n) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | Micro USB | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | No |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 | GSM B3/B5/B8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA Bands 1/5/8 | WCDMA B1/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B/B1/B3/B5/B8/B38/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B3/B5/B8/B19/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48) |
| LTE category | 7 | n/a |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | n/a | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Budget | Mid-range |
| Announced | September, 2022 yr | July, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | September, 2022 yr | July, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 140 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 240 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 10 W | Yes, 67 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Redmi Note 17 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0