Home Phone comparison Oppo Realme C35 and Vivo X300 Pro - Which is better?

Oppo Realme C35 vs Vivo X300 Pro

44 out 100
Oppo Realme C35
VS
90 out 100
Vivo X300 Pro
Oppo Realme C35
Vivo X300 Pro

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme C35 Manufactured in February, 2022, with display 6.6 with chipsetUnisoc Tiger T616, vs Vivo X300 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme C35
  • Lighter design: 189g vs 226g
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Pro
  • Larger display: 6.78in
  • Higher pixel density: 452ppi
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
  • Higher battery capacity: 6510mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
  • Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
  • Supports DisplayPort
  • Infrared port
  • Built-in eSIM

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 4/64 GB
- 4/128 GB
- 6/64 GB
- 6/128 GB		 - 12/256 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB

Review

Key Specs Oppo Realme C35 and Vivo X300 Pro
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Oppo Realme C35
vs
Vivo X300 Pro

Display

Display quality comparison
Type IPS LCD AMOLED
Size 6.6 in 6.78 in
Resolution 1080x2408 pixels 1260x2800 pixels
Aspect ratio 20:9 20:9
Pixel density 401 ppi 452 ppi
Refresh rate 60 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate No Yes (1-120 Hz)
Max brightness 450 nits 2000 nits
HDR support No Yes, Dolby Vision
Touch Sampling Rate 180 Hz 300 Hz
Screen-to-body ratio 84.6 % 90.8 %
Features n/a - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming
Display test
Peak brightness (auto)
Oppo Realme C35
558 nits
Vivo X300 Pro
2611 nits
sRGB gamut96 %n/a
Response time37 msn/a
Contrast975:1n/a
Sources: NotebookCheck [Oppo Realme C35]

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 164.4 mm (6.47 in) 161.98 mm (6.38 in)
Width 75.6 mm (2.98 in) 75.48 mm (2.97 in)
Thickness 8.1 mm (0.32 in) 7.99 mm (0.31 in)
Weight 189 g (6.67 oz) 226 g (7.97 oz)
Water resistance No IP69
Cooling system n/a Vapor chamber
Back panel Plastic Glass
Frame Plastic Metal
Colors - Black
- Green		 - White
- Black
- Blue
- Brown
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Button Yes, In-Display
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Realme C35
84.6 %
Vivo X300 Pro
90.8 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Realme C35 and Vivo X300 Pro In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T616 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
Max Frequency 2000 MHz 4210 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (2 + 6) 8 (1 + 3 + 4)
Architecture - 6/1.8 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/2 (Cortex-A75)		 - 4/2.7 (C1-Pro)
- 3/3.5 (C1-Premium)
- 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 12 nm 3 nm
Neural Processor No MediaTek NPU 990
Graphics Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G1 Ultra MP12
GPU Cores 32 1536
GPU Frequency 750 MHz 1716 MHz
FLOPS 96 GFLOPS 5271.5 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Realme C35
446
Vivo X300 Pro
3447
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Realme C35
1576
Vivo X300 Pro
10378
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)4463447
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)157610378
Geekbench Compute (GPU)n/a25723
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo Realme C35], [Vivo X300 Pro]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Realme C35
271948
Vivo X300 Pro
4011932
CPU867621043247
GPU323631510982
Memory83661667254
UX69162790449
NanoReview Score2719484011932
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
Oppo Realme C35
463
Vivo X300 Pro
n/a
Max Surface Temp.43.8 °Cn/a
Stability98 %n/a
Graphics Test2 fpsn/a
Graphics Score463n/a
Sources: 3DMark [Oppo Realme C35]
PCMark 3.0
PCMark 3.0
Oppo Realme C35
7805
Vivo X300 Pro
n/a
Writing score9306n/a
Web score6933n/a
Video editing4778n/a
Data manipulation5966n/a
NanoReview Score7805n/a

Memory

RAM
RAM Size - 4 GB
- 6 GB		 12 GB
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency n/a 5333 MHz
Channels 2 4
Storage
Storage Capacity- 64 GB
- 128 GB		256 GB
Storage TypeUFS 2.2UFS 4.1
Memory CardMicroSDNo

Software

OS Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) Android 16
OS Size 18 GB n/a
UI Skin Realme UI T Edition OriginOS 6

Battery

Volume 5000 mAh 6510 mAh
Max Charging Power 18 W 90 W
Battery Type Li-Po Silicon Carbon (Si/C)
Removable No No
Wireless Charging No Yes (40 W)
Reverse Charging Yes Yes, (Wireless)
Fast Charging Yes (50% in 60 min) Yes (55% in 15 min)
Full Charge Time 2:12 h 0:29 h
Battery Life Test
Battery Life
Oppo Realme C35
n/a
Vivo X300 Pro
20:40
Web Browsingn/a08:45 h
Video Playbackn/a14:55 h
Gamesn/a06:08 h
Standby Moden/a81 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 8700x5800 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Zoom Digital Optical, 3.7x
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Digital Optical
8K Recording No Yes (Up to 30 fps)
4K Recording No Yes (Up to 120 fps)
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 30 fps) Yes (Up to 60 fps)
Slow Motion n/a 240 fps (1080p)
Wide-angle lens n/a 119 °
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Macro: 2 MP
Depth: 0.3 MP		 Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 200 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode
Main lens
Matrix50 MP50 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.6
Focal length26 mm24 mm
Sensorn/aSony LYT-828
Sensor size1/2.761/1.28
Pixel size0.64 μm1.22 μm
AutofocusPhase autofocusLaser autofocus
StabilizationDigitalOptical
Telephoto
Matrixn/a200 MP
Aperturen/af/2.7
Focal lengthn/a85 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung ISOCELL HPB
Sensor sizen/a1/1.4
Pixel sizen/a0.56 μm
Stabilizationn/aOptical
Ultra-wide lens
Matrixn/a50 MP
Aperturen/af/2.0
Focal lengthn/a15 mm
Sensorn/aSamsung S5KJN1
Sensor sizen/a1/2.76
Pixel sizen/a0.64 μm
Stabilizationn/aDigital

Front camera

Matrix 8 MP 50 MP
Photo resolution 3264x2448 pixels 8192x6144 pixels
Aperture f/2.0 f/2.0
Focal length 26 mm n/a
Sensor CMOS Samsung S5KJN1
Sensor size 1/4.0 1/2.76
Pixel size n/a 0.64 μm
Autofocus No Phase autofocus
Stabilization Digital Digital
Video resolution 720p at 30 fps 2160p (4K) at 60 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5 5.4
Bluetooth features LE, A2DP LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 3.2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG
DisplayPort n/a Yes
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
NFC* Varies by region Yes
Infrared Port No Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoYes
Hybrid SlotNoNo
2G BandsGSM 850/900/1800/1900MHzGSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz
3G BandsWCDMA 1/5/8WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19
LTE Bands*LTE (B1/B3/B5/B7/B8/B20/B28)LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66)
LTE category7n/a
5G SupportNoYes

Sound

Speakers Mono n/a
3.5 mm Jack Yes No
FM Radio Yes No
Dolby Atmos No No
Speaker Test
Max Volume
Oppo Realme C35
85.5 dB
Vivo X300 Pro
n/a

Other

Class Budget Flagship
Announced February, 2022 yr October, 2025 yr
Release Date February, 2022 yr October, 2025 yr
Launch Price ($) 160 n/a
MSRP ($) n/a 899
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 18 W Yes, 90 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below