Oppo Realme GT Master Edition vs Vivo X300 Pro
53
out 100
VS
90
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme GT Master Edition Manufactured in July, 2021, with display 6.43 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 778 5G, vs Vivo X300 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme GT Master Edition
- Lighter design: 174g vs 226g
Reasons to choose Vivo X300 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 6510mAh vs 4300mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.43 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 402 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 630 nits | 2000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10 | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 360 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 85.3 % | 90.8 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 100 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 245 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 7 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 159.2 mm (6.27 in) | 161.98 mm (6.38 in) |
| Width | 73.5 mm (2.89 in) | 75.48 mm (2.97 in) |
| Thickness | 8.7 mm (0.34 in) | 7.99 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 174 g (6.14 oz) | 226 g (7.97 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Gray |
- White - Black - Blue - Brown |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778 5G | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)) - 1/2.4 (Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 770 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 642 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 512 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 490 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 844 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1046 | 3447 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2889 | 10378 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 25723 |
| CPU | 217957 | 1043247 |
| GPU | 138485 | 1510982 |
| Memory | 120353 | 667254 |
| UX | 131031 | 790449 |
| NanoReview Score | 607826 | 4011932 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 49.6 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 14 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 2492 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 11 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 16 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 4.0 | OriginOS 6 |
Battery
| Volume | 4300 mAh | 6510 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 65 W | 90 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (40 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 15 min) | Yes (55% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:31 h | 0:29 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:53 h | 08:45 h |
| Video Playback | 12:12 h | 14:55 h |
| Games | 05:11 h | 06:08 h |
| Standby Mode | 101 h | 81 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 9280x6920 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3.7x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (720p) | 240 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 119 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 24 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/2 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.7 |
| Focal length | n/a | 85 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HPB |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.56 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.8 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.14 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x4896 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE, A2DP | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B43/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | Yes | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | No |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | July, 2021 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2021 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 355 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 899 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 65 W | Yes, 90 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X300 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
