Oppo Realme GT Neo 3 vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra
63
out 100
VS
96
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme GT Neo 3 Manufactured in March, 2022, with display 6.7 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8100, vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra, Manufactured in May, 2026 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme GT Neo 3
- Lighter design: 188g vs 235g
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Ultra
- Larger display: 6.82in
- Higher pixel density: 510ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7050mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.3
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.82 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 1440x3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 19.8:9 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 510 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 600 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 1000 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 87.7 % | 90 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 100 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 359 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 11 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.3 mm (6.43 in) | 163.16 mm (6.42 in) |
| Width | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) | 76.97 mm (3.03 in) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) | 8.65 mm (0.34 in) |
| Weight | 188 g (6.63 oz) | 235 g (8.29 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Silver - Blue |
- White - Green - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 |
| Max Frequency | 2850 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (2 + 6) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.85 (Cortex-A78) |
- 6/3.63 (Oryon Gen 3 Performance) - 2/4.61 (Oryon Gen 3 Prime) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 5 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 580 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G610 MP6 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 768 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 860 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 1309 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1096 | 3646 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3393 | 11276 |
| CPU | 249904 | 1166693 |
| GPU | 215630 | 1523262 |
| Memory | 183608 | 509363 |
| UX | 228973 | 886789 |
| NanoReview Score | 878115 | 4086107 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 48.5 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 95 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 33 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 5650 | n/a |
| Writing score | 20973 | n/a |
| Web score | 11338 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6664 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 9389 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 14531 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 6 GB - 8 GB - 12 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | n/a | 5300 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 13) | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 3.0 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7050 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 12 min) | Yes (75% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:33 h | 0:45 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:56 h | 16:45 h |
| Video Playback | 13:29 h | 26:15 h |
| Games | 05:25 h | 08:23 h |
| Standby Mode | 104 h | 144 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 10x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (720p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 120 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.9 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Sony LYTIA-901 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.12 (0.89) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | OmniVision OV52A |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.28 (0.78) |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.61 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.3 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Sony LYTIA-600 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/1.95 (0.51) |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 16 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 4608x3456 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.5 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5K3P9 | Samsung ISOCELL JN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/3.09 | 1/2.75 (0.36) |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B32/B66/B71) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | n/a |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | March, 2022 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | March, 2022 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 410 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes, 100 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Ultra the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
