Oppo Realme GT2 Pro vs Oppo Find X9 Pro
69
out 100
VS
96
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Realme GT2 Pro Manufactured in January, 2022, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, vs Oppo Find X9 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2025 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Realme GT2 Pro
- Higher pixel density: 526ppi
- Lighter design: 189g vs 224g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher battery capacity: 7500mAh vs 5000mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.0 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1440x3216 pixels | 1264x2780 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 526 ppi | 450 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 88.9 % | 90 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 96.7 % | n/a |
| PWM (Flicker) | 367 Hz | n/a |
| Response time | 10 ms | n/a |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | n/a |
Design & Build
| Height | 163.2 mm (6.43 in) | 161.26 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) | 76.46 mm (3.01 in) |
| Thickness | 8.2 mm (0.32 in) | 8.25 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 224 g (7.9 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Black - Blue - Green |
- White - Gray - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 3000 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A510) - 3/2.5 (Cortex-A710) - 1/3 (Cortex-X2) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Adreno 730 | Mali-G1 Ultra MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 1024 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 818 MHz | 1716 MHz |
| FLOPS | 1675.3 GFLOPS | 5271.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1385 | 3235 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 3676 | 9626 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | n/a | 29534 |
| CPU | 299367 | 1030180 |
| GPU | 402344 | 1453877 |
| Memory | 196725 | 709892 |
| UX | 251682 | 762936 |
| NanoReview Score | 1150118 | 3956885 |
| Max Surface Temp. | 47.4 °C | n/a |
| Stability | 66 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 56 fps | n/a |
| Graphics Score | 9406 | n/a |
| Writing score | 20866 | n/a |
| Web score | 11376 | n/a |
| Video editing | 6033 | n/a |
| Data manipulation | 9556 | n/a |
| NanoReview Score | 14100 | n/a |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB - 512 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 12 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 16 |
| OS Size | 21 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | Realme UI 5.0 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 7500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 65 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | No | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (91% in 30 min) | Yes (54% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:40 h | 1:20 h |
| Web Browsing | 08:58 h | 19:04 h |
| Video Playback | 12:56 h | 25:00 h |
| Games | 05:13 h | 10:24 h |
| Standby Mode | 119 h | 107 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | Up to 24FPS | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 150 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP Macro: 3 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX766 | Sony LYT-828 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/1.28 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 200 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | n/a | 70 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.5 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.76 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6464x4864 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 21 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX615 | Samsung S5KJN5 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | No | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 | GSM 850/900/1800MHz |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19 | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 20 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | n/a |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | Yes | Yes |
Other
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2022 yr | October, 2025 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 610 | n/a |
| MSRP ($) | n/a | 1299 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 65 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
