Oppo Reno 10 Pro 5G vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Reno 10 Pro 5G Manufactured in July, 2023, with display 6.7 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 778G, vs Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, Manufactured in January, 2020 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 855. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 10 Pro 5G
- Higher pixel density: 394ppi
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 185g vs 186g
- Higher battery capacity: 4600mAh vs 4500mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.2 vs 5
- Infrared port
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB |
- 6/128 GB - 8/128 GB - 8/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 1080x2400 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 393 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | No |
| Max brightness | 500 nits | 400 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | n/a |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 90 % | 88.2 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 98.3 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 250 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 32 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) | 162.5 mm (6.4 in) |
| Width | 74.2 mm (2.92 in) | 75.6 mm (2.98 in) |
| Thickness | 7.89 mm (0.31 in) | 8.1 mm (0.32 in) |
| Weight | 185 g (6.53 oz) | 186 g (6.56 oz) |
| Water resistance | No | No |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Plastic |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Gray - Purple |
- White - Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 |
| Max Frequency | 2400 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/1.8 (Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.4 (Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)) - 1/2.4 (Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)) |
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver)) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) - 1/2.84 (Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | Hexagon 770 | Hexagon 690 |
| Graphics | Adreno 642 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Cores | 512 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 550 MHz | 585 MHz |
| FLOPS | 844 GFLOPS | 898.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1004 | 945 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2685 | 2435 |
| CPU | 218085 | 188208 |
| GPU | 138836 | 136484 |
| Memory | 140981 | 129432 |
| UX | 145274 | 149377 |
| NanoReview Score | 643176 | 603501 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 39.1 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 88 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 18 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3072 |
| Writing score | n/a | 12580 |
| Web score | n/a | 7314 |
| Video editing | n/a | 6028 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7672 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 10009 |
Memory
| RAM Size | - 8 GB - 12 GB |
- 6 GB - 8 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | - 128 GB - 256 GB | - 128 GB - 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 13 (Upgradeable to Android 14) | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | n/a | 22.5 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 13.1 | One UI 5.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 4600 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-ion |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (58% in 15 min) | Yes (50% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:30 h | 1:40 h |
| Web Browsing | 07:27 h | 08:04 h |
| Video Playback | 11:42 h | 13:13 h |
| Games | 04:40 h | 04:48 h |
| Standby Mode | 125 h | 122 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Digital |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 32 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Ultra-wide: 12 MP Macro: 5 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX890 | Samsung S5KGM1 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 | 1/2.0 |
| Pixel size | 1 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 32 MP | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | n/a |
| Focal length | 47 mm | n/a |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | n/a |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | n/a | 12 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | n/a |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | n/a |
| Pixel size | 1.14 μm | n/a |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x3680 pixels | 6464x4864 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | Samsung S5KGD1 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM GSM850, GSM900, DCS1800, PCS1900 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | UMTS B1 (2100), B2 (1900), B4(AWS), B5(850), B8 (900) |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B20/B26/B28/B66) |
| LTE category | 18 | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Mono |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | July, 2023 yr | January, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | July, 2023 yr | January, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 395 | 650 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Hall Sensor - Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 10 Pro 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0