Oppo Reno 11 F 5G vs Xiaomi 14 Pro
59
out 100
VS
86
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Reno 11 F 5G Manufactured in February, 2024, with display 6.7 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7050, vs Xiaomi 14 Pro, Manufactured in October, 2023 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 11 F 5G
- Lighter design: 177g vs 223g
- Higher battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4880mAh
Reasons to choose Xiaomi 14 Pro
- Larger display: 6.73in
- Higher pixel density: 522ppi
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | 8/256 GB | - 12/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | OLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.73 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 1440x3200 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 522 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | No | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1100 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 99.5 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 120 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 1 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.6 mm (6.36 in) | 161.4 mm (6.35 in) |
| Width | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) | 75.3 mm (2.96 in) |
| Thickness | 7.54 mm (0.3 in) | 8.49 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 223 g (7.87 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP65 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | n/a | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Blue - Green - Purple |
- Black - Silver - Gray - Green |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 |
| Max Frequency | 2600 MHz | 3300 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (2 + 6) | 8 (1 + 3 + 2 + 2) |
| Architecture | - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.6 (Cortex-A78) |
- 2/2.27 (Cortex-A520) - 2/2.96 (Cortex-A720) - 3/3.15 (Cortex-A720) - 1/3.3 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 550 | Hexagon |
| Graphics | Mali-G68 MP4 | Adreno 750 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 903-1000 MHz |
| FLOPS | 686 GFLOPS | 2774 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 899 | 2123 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2345 | 6908 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2394 | n/a |
| CPU | 162422 | 437279 |
| GPU | 118993 | 858445 |
| Memory | 162129 | 436964 |
| UX | 158425 | 323273 |
| NanoReview Score | 601969 | 2055961 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 48.2 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 80 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 96 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 16045 |
| Writing score | n/a | 20041 |
| Web score | n/a | 14615 |
| Video editing | n/a | 7913 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 14777 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 16119 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 14 | HyperOS 2.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 4880 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 67 W | 120 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (50% in 19 min) | Yes (50% in 8 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:45 h | 0:18 h |
| Web Browsing | n/a | 10:49 h |
| Video Playback | n/a | 16:30 h |
| Games | n/a | 05:10 h |
| Standby Mode | n/a | 113 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | n/a | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 3.2x |
| Flash | LED | Dual LED |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (1080p) | 1920 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | 115 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 64 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP Macro: 2 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 64 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.7 | f/1.4 - 4.0 |
| Focal length | 25 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Omnivision OV64B | Samsung Light Hunter 900 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.0 | 1/1.31 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.2 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 50 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 75 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 14 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.12 μm | 1.12 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 32 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 6528x3680 pixels | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.4 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 22 mm | 22 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX709 | Omnivision OV32B |
| Sensor size | 1/2.74 | 1/3 |
| Pixel size | 0.8 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | n/a | Yes DP 1.2 |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM B3 / B5 / B8 |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1 / B4 / B5 / B6 / B8 / B19 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B18/B19/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Mono | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | February, 2024 yr | October, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | February, 2024 yr | October, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 299 | 1100 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 67 W | Yes 120 W |
Note
Xiaomi 14 Pro:
New Longjing Glass is used. The frame can be either aluminum or titanium, with a weight difference of 7 grams.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi 14 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
