Oppo Reno 12 Pro 5G vs Vivo X100 Pro
73
out 100
VS
86
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Reno 12 Pro 5G Manufactured in June, 2024, with display 6.7 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, vs Vivo X100 Pro, Manufactured in November, 2023 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9300. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 12 Pro 5G
- Lighter design: 181g vs 225g
Reasons to choose Vivo X100 Pro
- Larger display: 6.78in
- Higher pixel density: 452ppi
- Higher battery capacity: 5400mAh vs 5000mAh
- Supports newer USB: 3.2 vs 2
- Supports DisplayPort
- Supports Dolby Atmos
- Built-in eSIM
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.7 in | 6.78 in |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 pixels | 1260x2800 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 20:9 | 20:9 |
| Pixel density | 394 ppi | 452 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (60-120 Hz) | Yes (1-120 Hz) |
| Max brightness | 1200 nits | 3000 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.7 % | 89.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | 98.7 % | 99.8 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | 60 Hz | 369 Hz |
| Response time | 1 ms | 1 ms |
| Contrast | ∞ Infinite | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 161.5 mm (6.36 in) | 164.05 mm (6.46 in) |
| Width | 74.8 mm (2.94 in) | 75.28 mm (2.96 in) |
| Thickness | 7.4 mm (0.29 in) | 8.91 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 225 g (7.94 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP65 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Plastic | Glass |
| Frame | Plastic | Metal |
| Colors | - Silver - Gold - Brown |
- White - Black - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 |
| Max Frequency | 2500 MHz | 3250 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (4 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2 (Cortex-A55) - 4/2.5 (Cortex-A78) |
- 4/2 (Cortex-A720) - 3/2.85 (Cortex-X4) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-X4) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 655 | MediaTek APU 790 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP2 | Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 256 | 1536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1047 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| FLOPS | 536.1 GFLOPS | 3993.6 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1043 | 2231 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 2999 | 7526 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 2524 | n/a |
| CPU | 205607 | 490601 |
| GPU | 144103 | 893392 |
| Memory | 172684 | 446780 |
| UX | 166089 | 321411 |
| NanoReview Score | 688483 | 2152184 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 51.1 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 66 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 92 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 15478 |
| Writing score | n/a | 23039 |
| Web score | n/a | 11895 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5599 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 12384 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 14116 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | - 12 GB - 16 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | - 256 GB - 512 GB | - 256 GB - 512 GB - 1024 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Memory Card | MicroSD | No |
Software
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 (Upgradeable to Android 15) |
| OS Size | 29 GB | n/a |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 14.1 | Funtouch 15 |
Battery
| Volume | 5000 mAh | 5400 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 100 W |
| Battery Type | Li-Po | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes |
| Fast Charging | Yes (67% in 15 min) | Yes (60% in 15 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:46 h | 0:31 h |
| Web Browsing | 11:19 h | 09:38 h |
| Video Playback | 17:35 h | 14:53 h |
| Games | 06:09 h | 06:25 h |
| Standby Mode | 113 h | 94 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8192x6144 pixels |
| Zoom | Optical, 2x | Optical, 4.3x |
| Flash | Dual LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 30 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 960 fps (720p) | 960 fps (1080p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 112 ° | 119 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 50 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.8 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | Sony LYT-600 | Sony IMX989 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/0.98 |
| Pixel size | 0.7 μm | 1.6 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Laser autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.5 |
| Focal length | 47 mm | 100 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Omnivision OV64B |
| Sensor size | 1/2.75 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 0.7 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 15 mm |
| Sensor | Sony IMX355 | Samsung S5KJN1 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2.76 |
| Pixel size | 1.14 μm | 0.64 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Bokeh | n/a | 70 |
| Preview | n/a | 81 |
| Zoom | n/a | 155 |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 6528x4896 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 20 mm |
| Sensor | Samsung S5KJN5 | Samsung S5KGD2 |
| Sensor size | 1/2.75 | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | 0.64 μm | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.2 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | Yes |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 1 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | n/a |
| eSIM Support * | No | Yes |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MHz | GSM 850/900/1800/1900MH |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/2/4/5/6/8/19 | WCDMA B1/B2/B4/B5/B8 |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66) | LTE (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66) |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | Stereo | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | n/a | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | June, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Release Date | June, 2024 yr | November, 2023 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | 599 | 800 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes 100 W |
Note
Vivo X100 Pro:
The top version (with 16 GB) comes with LPDDR5T memory, while the others feature LPDDR5X.
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Vivo X100 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
