Oppo Reno 13 5G vs Oppo Find X2 Pro
79
out 100
VS
62
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Reno 13 5G Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.59 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350, vs Oppo Find X2 Pro, Manufactured in April, 2020 with chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 865. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 13 5G
- Lighter design: 181g vs 207g
- Higher battery capacity: 5600mAh vs 4260mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.1
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
- Includes charger
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X2 Pro
- Larger display: 6.7in
- Higher pixel density: 513ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | OLED |
| Size | 6.59 in | 6.7 in |
| Resolution | 1256x2760 pixels | 1440x3168 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 19.8:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 513 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 1200 nits | 800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Touch Sampling Rate | n/a | 240 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6 % | 88.7 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 100 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 480 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 2.6 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 157.9 mm (6.22 in) | 165.2 mm (6.5 in) |
| Width | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) | 74.4 mm (2.93 in) |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm (0.28 in) | 8.8 mm (0.35 in) |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 207 g (7.3 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Ceramic |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Purple |
- Black - Blue |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 2840 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 585 Silver (Cortex-A55)) - 3/2.42 (Kryo 585 Gold (Cortex-A77)) - 1/2.84 (Kryo 585 Prime (Cortex-A77)) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | Hexagon 698 |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Adreno 650 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 768 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 587 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 1202.1 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1331 | 1239 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4012 | 3417 |
| CPU | 312085 | 147241 |
| GPU | 542850 | 192634 |
| Memory | 268721 | 131026 |
| UX | 239690 | 157653 |
| NanoReview Score | 1363346 | 628554 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 39.8 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 22 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3828 |
| Writing score | n/a | 14830 |
| Web score | n/a | 7575 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5885 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 7636 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 10734 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 512 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 10.0 (Upgradeable to Android 13) |
| OS Size | n/a | 53 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | ColorOS 13.1 |
Battery
| Volume | 5600 mAh | 4260 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 65 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | No |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | No |
| Fast Charging | Yes (74% in 30 min) | Yes SuperVOOC 2.0 Flash Charge (100% in 40 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:43 h | 0:40 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:13 h | 06:49 h |
| Video Playback | 18:35 h | 10:55 h |
| Games | 07:13 h | 04:44 h |
| Standby Mode | 134 h | 89 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 8000x6000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 5x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 115 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 48 MP Telephoto: 13 MP Ultra-wide: 48 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.7 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 25 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX689 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/1.43 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.12 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 13 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/3.0 |
| Focal length | n/a | 129 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3M5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.4 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 48 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 17 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX586 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/2 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 6464x4864 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Sony IMX616 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.8 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 0.8 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | No |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 700 / 800 / 850 / 900 / 1800 / 2100 / 1900 / 2000 / 2300 / 2500 / 2600 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B700/B800/B850/B900/B1800/B1900/B2000/B2100/B2300/B2500/B2600) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 1320 |
| MSRP ($) | 500 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | n/a |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 13 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
