Oppo Reno 13 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus
79
out 100
VS
58
out 100
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Reno 13 5G Manufactured in November, 2024, with display 6.59 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8350, vs Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus, Manufactured in August, 2019 with chipsetSamsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 13 5G
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz
- Lighter design: 181g vs 196g
- Higher battery capacity: 5600mAh vs 4300mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5
- Infrared port
- Built-in eSIM
Reasons to choose Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus
- Larger display: 6.8in
- Higher pixel density: 495ppi
- Supports newer USB: 3.1 vs 2
- Supports Dolby Atmos
Versions
| Memory Options | - 8/128 GB - 8/256 GB - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/256 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| Size | 6.59 in | 6.8 in |
| Resolution | 1256x2760 pixels | 1440x3040 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | n/a | 19:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 495 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes | No |
| Max brightness | 1200 nits | 700 nits |
| HDR support | Yes HDR10+ | Yes HDR10+ |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6 % | 92.1 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display |
| sRGB gamut | n/a | 95.4 % |
| PWM (Flicker) | n/a | 250 Hz |
| Response time | n/a | 3.6 ms |
| Contrast | n/a | ∞ Infinite |
Design & Build
| Height | 157.9 mm (6.22 in) | 162.3 mm (6.39 in) |
| Width | 74.7 mm (2.94 in) | 77.2 mm (3.04 in) |
| Thickness | 7.2 mm (0.28 in) | 7.9 mm (0.31 in) |
| Weight | 181 g (6.38 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP68 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | n/a |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - Black - Blue - Purple |
- White - Black - Red |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes In-Display | Yes In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | Samsung Exynos 9 Octa 9825 |
| Max Frequency | 3350 MHz | 2730 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (2 + 2 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.2 (Cortex-A510) - 3/3.2 (Cortex-A715) - 1/3.35 (Cortex-A715) |
- 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A75) - 2/2.73 (M4) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek APU 780 | Yes |
| Graphics | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| GPU Cores | 768 | 432 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 770 MHz |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 651.5 GFLOPS |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1331 | 963 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 4012 | 2544 |
| CPU | 312085 | 169143 |
| GPU | 542850 | 208710 |
| Memory | 268721 | 148420 |
| UX | 239690 | 141661 |
| NanoReview Score | 1363346 | 667934 |
| Max Surface Temp. | n/a | 38.8 °C |
| Stability | n/a | 97 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 20 fps |
| Graphics Score | n/a | 3377 |
| Writing score | n/a | 10979 |
| Web score | n/a | 7212 |
| Video editing | n/a | 5811 |
| Data manipulation | n/a | 6704 |
| NanoReview Score | n/a | 9038 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 8 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Channels | 4 | 2 |
| Storage Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Memory Card | No | MicroSD |
Software
| OS | Android 15 | Android 9.0 (Upgradeable to Android 12) |
| OS Size | n/a | 31.6 GB |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 15 | One UI 4.0 |
Battery
| Volume | 5600 mAh | 4300 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 45 W |
| Battery Type | n/a | Li-Po |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | No | Yes Qi/PMA (15 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes (74% in 30 min) | Yes Samsung Adaptive Fast Charge (65% in 30 min) |
| Full Charge Time | 0:43 h | 1:05 h |
| Web Browsing | 12:13 h | 06:30 h |
| Video Playback | 18:35 h | 11:51 h |
| Games | 07:13 h | 04:44 h |
| Standby Mode | 134 h | 105 h |
Main camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 4000x3000 pixels |
| Zoom | Digital | Optical, 2x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | No |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 60 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 240 fps (1080p) | 960 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 115 ° | 123 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 8 MP |
Standard: 12 MP Telephoto: 12 MP Ultra-wide: 16 MP Depth: 0.3 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode - RAW support |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 12 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.5 - 2.4 |
| Focal length | 26 mm | 27 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung SAK2L4 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.95 | 1/2.55 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.4 μm |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus (Dual Pixel) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | n/a | 12 MP |
| Aperture | n/a | f/2.1 |
| Focal length | n/a | 52 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3M3 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/3.6 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | n/a | Optical |
| Matrix | 8 MP | 16 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.2 | f/2.2 |
| Focal length | 15 mm | 12 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3P9 |
| Sensor size | 1/4.0 | 1/3.1 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1 μm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 10 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | 3648x2736 pixels |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 21 mm | 26 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung S5K3J1 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/2.65 |
| Pixel size | n/a | 1.22 μm |
| Autofocus | n/a | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 30 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11 b/g/n/ac/ax) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | PBAP/PAB, PAN, OPP, MAP, LE, HSP, HID, HFP, DIP, AVRCP, A2DP |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | 3.1 |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
| NFC* | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | No |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | Yes | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | n/a | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G Bands | n/a | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| LTE Bands* | n/a | LTE (B/B20/B150/B2048) |
| LTE category | n/a | 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| Speakers | n/a | Stereo |
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | Yes |
| Dolby Atmos | No | Yes |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | August, 2019 yr |
| Release Date | November, 2024 yr | August, 2019 yr |
| Launch Price ($) | n/a | 1099 |
| MSRP ($) | 500 | n/a |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Barometer - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes 80 W | Yes 25 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 13 5G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
