Home Phone comparison Oppo Reno 14 Pro and Tecno Spark Go 3 - Which is better?

Oppo Reno 14 Pro vs Tecno Spark Go 3

82 out 100
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
VS
48 out 100
Tecno Spark Go 3
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
Tecno Spark Go 3

Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Reno 14 Pro Manufactured in May, 2025, with display 6.83 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8450, vs Tecno Spark Go 3, Manufactured in January, 2026 with chipsetUnisoc T7250. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

  1. Differences
  2. Review
  3. Specs
  4. Benchmarks
  5. Battery Life
  6. Cameras
  7. Comments (0)

Key Differences

Device key advantages
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 14 Pro
  • Larger display: 6.83in
  • Higher pixel density: 450ppi
  • Higher battery capacity: 6200mAh vs 5000mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version: 5.4 vs 5.2
Reasons to choose Tecno Spark Go 3
  • Lighter design: 182g vs 201g

Versions

Available versions and configurations
Memory Options - 12/256 GB
- 12/512 GB
- 16/512 GB
- 16/1024 GB		 n/a

Review

Key Specs Oppo Reno 14 Pro and Tecno Spark Go 3
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Customize your score
Function
Importance (Weight)
Display:
Camera:
Performance:
Gaming:
Battery:
Connectivity:
Higher weight means greater impact on NanoReview score.

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison
Smartphones:
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
vs
Tecno Spark Go 3

Display

Display quality comparison
Type AMOLED IPS LCD
Size 6.83 in 6.74 in
Resolution 1272x2800 pixels 720x1600 pixels
Aspect ratio n/a 20:9
Pixel density 450 ppi 260 ppi
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Adaptive refresh rate Yes No
Max brightness 600 nits 500 nits
HDR support Yes HDR10+ No
Screen-to-body ratio 90.1 % 84.1 %
Features - DCI-P3
- Always-On Display
- DC dimming		 n/a

Design & Build

Design and ergonomics comparison
Height 163.4 mm (6.43 in) 167.7 mm (6.6 in)
Width 77 mm (3.03 in) 77.8 mm (3.06 in)
Thickness 7.5 mm (0.3 in) 8.1 mm (0.32 in)
Weight 201 g (7.09 oz) 182 g (6.42 oz)
Water resistance IP69 IP64
Cooling system Vapor chamber n/a
Back panel Glass Plastic
Frame Metal Plastic
Colors - White
- Black
- Purple		 - Black
- Gray
- Blue
- Purple
Fingerprint sensor Yes In-Display Yes, In-Button
Screen-to-body ratio
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
90.1 %
Tecno Spark Go 3
84.1 %

Performance

Testing Oppo Reno 14 Pro and Tecno Spark Go 3 In benchmarks
Processor
Chipset MediaTek Dimensity 8450 Unisoc T7250
Max Frequency 3250 MHz 1800 MHz
CPU Cores 8 (1 + 3 + 4) 8 (2 + 6)
Architecture - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725)
- 3/3 (Cortex-A725)
- 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725)		 - 6/1.6 (Cortex-A55)
- 2/1.8 (Cortex-A75)
Process TSMC TSMC
Transistor Size 4 nm 12 nm
Neural Processor MediaTek NPU 880 No
Graphics Mali-G720 MP7 Mali-G57 MP1
GPU Cores 896 32
GPU Frequency 1300 MHz 850 MHz
FLOPS 2329.6 GFLOPS 54.4 GFLOPS
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
1617
Tecno Spark Go 3
436
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
6406
Tecno Spark Go 3
1416
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)1617436
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)64061416
Sources: Geekbench v6 [Oppo Reno 14 Pro], [Tecno Spark Go 3]
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Oppo Reno 14 Pro
1675507
Tecno Spark Go 3
286102
CPU38848287139
GPU61099326538
Memory375299102815
UX30073369610
NanoReview Score1675507286102

Memory

RAM
RAM Size 12 GB 4 GB
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4266 MHz 1866 MHz
Channels 4 2
Storage
Storage Capacity256 GB64 GB
Storage TypeUFS 3.1eMMC 5.1
Memory CardNoMicroSD

Software

OS Android 15 Android 15
UI Skin ColorOS 15 HIOS 15

Battery

Volume 6200 mAh 5000 mAh
Max Charging Power 80 W 15 W
Battery Type n/a Li-Po
Removable No No
Wireless Charging Yes (50 W) No
Reverse Charging Yes No
Fast Charging Yes (73% in 30 min) Yes (49% in 40 min)
Full Charge Time 0:53 h 1:54 h

Main camera

Matrix 50 MP 13 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Zoom Optical, 3.5x Digital
Flash LED Dual LED
Stabilization Optical Digital
8K Recording No No
4K Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) No
1080p Recording Yes (Up to 60 fps) Yes (Up to 30 fps)
Slow Motion 240 fps (1080p) n/a
Wide-angle lens 116 ° n/a
Lenses count Standard: 50 MP
Telephoto: 50 MP
Ultra-wide: 50 MP		 Standard: 13 MP
Features - Bokeh effect
- Pro mode		 Bokeh effect
Main lens
Matrix50 MP13 MP
Aperturef/1.8f/1.8
Focal length24 mm27 mm
AutofocusPhase autofocusPhase autofocus
StabilizationOpticalDigital
Telephoto
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.8n/a
Focal length80 mmn/a
SensorSamsung S5KJN5n/a
Sensor size1/2.76n/a
Pixel size0.6 μmn/a
StabilizationOpticaln/a
Ultra-wide lens
Matrix50 MPn/a
Aperturef/2.0n/a
Focal length16 mmn/a
StabilizationDigitaln/a

Front camera

Matrix 50 MP 8 MP
Photo resolution 8192x6144 pixels n/a
Aperture f/2.0 n/a
Focal length 21 mm n/a
Sensor Samsung S5KJN5 CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.76 n/a
Pixel size 0.6 μm n/a
Autofocus No No
Stabilization Digital No
Video resolution 2160p (4K) at 60 fps 1080p (Full HD) at 30 fps
TOF 3D sensor No No

Connectivity

Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) Wi-Fi 5 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac)
Wi-Fi features - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi MiMO
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display		 - Dual Band
- Wi-Fi Direct
- Wi-Fi Hotspot
- Wi-Fi Display
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Bluetooth features LE LE
USB type USB Type-C USB Type-C
USB version 2 2
USB features - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
- OTG		 - Charging
- USB Storage Mode
DisplayPort No No
GPS - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS		 - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
NFC* Yes No
Infrared Port Yes Yes
Connectivity
SIM Count*22
SIM TypeNanoNano
SIM ModeDual SIM StandbyDual SIM Standby
eSIM Support *NoNo
Hybrid SlotNoNo
5G SupportYesNo

Sound

3.5 mm Jack No Yes
FM Radio No Yes
Dolby Atmos No No

Other

Class Mid-range Budget
Announced May, 2025 yr January, 2026 yr
Release Date May, 2025 yr January, 2026 yr
MSRP ($) 550 99
Sensors - Proximity Sensor
- Gyroscope
- Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Compass
- Fingerprint sensor		 - Accelerometer
- Ambient Light Sensor
- Fingerprint sensor
Charger Included Yes 80 W Yes, 15 W
* Attention! Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Reno 14 Pro the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below