Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini vs Oppo Find X9s Pro
Compared 2 smartphones : Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini Manufactured in January, 2026, with display 6.32 with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8450, vs Oppo Find X9s Pro, Manufactured in May, 2026with chipsetMediaTek Dimensity 9500. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Key Differences
Reasons to choose Oppo Reno 15 Pro Mini
- Lighter design: 187g vs 198g
Reasons to choose Oppo Find X9s Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz
- Higher battery capacity: 7025mAh vs 6200mAh
- Newer Bluetooth version: 6.1 vs 5.4
Versions
| Memory Options | - 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB |
- 12/256 GB - 12/512 GB - 16/512 GB - 16/1024 GB |
Review
Display
Color accuracy, sharpness & brightness
Camera
Main & front camera tests
Performance
App & system performance
Games
3D gaming performance
Battery
Battery life, charging speed & type
Connectivity
Connectivity features
Adjust each parameter’s importance to find the best match for you.
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonDisplay
| Type | AMOLED | AMOLED |
| Size | 6.32 in | 6.32 in |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 pixels | 1216x2640 pixels |
| Aspect ratio | 19.5:9 | 19.5:9 |
| Pixel density | 460 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz |
| Adaptive refresh rate | Yes (1-120 Hz) | Yes |
| Max brightness | 1800 nits | 1800 nits |
| HDR support | Yes, HDR10+ | Yes, Dolby Vision |
| Touch Sampling Rate | 240 Hz | 300 Hz |
| Screen-to-body ratio | 89.6 % | 90.9 % |
| Features | - DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
- DCI-P3 - Always-On Display - DC dimming |
Design & Build
| Height | 151.2 mm (5.95 in) | 150.5 mm (5.93 in) |
| Width | 72.4 mm (2.85 in) | 71.7 mm (2.82 in) |
| Thickness | 80 mm (3.15 in) | 8.4 mm (0.33 in) |
| Weight | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Water resistance | IP69 | IP69 |
| Cooling system | Vapor chamber | Vapor chamber |
| Back panel | Glass | Glass |
| Frame | Metal | Metal |
| Colors | - White - Brown |
- White - Gray - Blue - Orange |
| Fingerprint sensor | Yes, In-Display | Yes, In-Display |
Screen-to-body ratio
Performance
| Chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 8450 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 |
| Max Frequency | 3250 MHz | 4210 MHz |
| CPU Cores | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) | 8 (1 + 3 + 4) |
| Architecture | - 4/2.1 (Cortex-A725) - 3/3 (Cortex-A725) - 1/3.25 (Cortex-A725) |
- 4/2.7 (C1-Pro) - 3/3.5 (C1-Premium) - 1/4.21 (C1-Ultra) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Transistor Size | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Neural Processor | MediaTek NPU 880 | MediaTek NPU 990 |
| Graphics | Mali-G720 MP7 | n/a |
| GPU Cores | 896 | n/a |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | n/a |
| FLOPS | 2329.6 GFLOPS | n/a |
| Geekbench 6 (Single-Core) | 1609 | 3302 |
| Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core) | 6381 | 10598 |
| Geekbench Compute (GPU) | 12250 | n/a |
| CPU | 401201 | 975847 |
| GPU | 584102 | 1334740 |
| Memory | 345872 | 388222 |
| UX | 309150 | 641387 |
| NanoReview Score | 1640325 | 3340196 |
Memory
| RAM Size | 12 GB | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | n/a |
| Channels | 4 | 4 |
| Storage Capacity | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| Storage Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.1 |
| Memory Card | No | No |
Software
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 |
| UI Skin | ColorOS 16 | ColorOS 16 |
Battery
| Volume | 6200 mAh | 7025 mAh |
| Max Charging Power | 80 W | 80 W |
| Battery Type | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) | Silicon Carbon (Si/C) |
| Removable | No | No |
| Wireless Charging | Yes (50 W) | Yes (50 W) |
| Reverse Charging | Yes | Yes, (Wireless) |
| Fast Charging | Yes | Yes |
Main camera
| Matrix | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Zoom | Optical, 3.5x | Optical, 2.8x |
| Flash | LED | LED |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| 8K Recording | No | Yes (Up to 30 fps) |
| 4K Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 120 fps) |
| 1080p Recording | Yes (Up to 60 fps) | Yes (Up to 240 fps) |
| Slow Motion | 480 fps (1080p) | 480 fps (720p) |
| Wide-angle lens | 100 ° | 120 ° |
| Lenses count | Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 50 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
Standard: 200 MP Telephoto: 200 MP Ultra-wide: 50 MP |
| Features | - Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
- Bokeh effect - Pro mode |
| Matrix | 200 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/1.8 | f/1.6 |
| Focal length | 24 mm | 23 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP9 |
| Sensor size | 1/1.56 (0.64) | 1/1.4 (0.71) |
| Pixel size | 0.5 μm | n/a |
| Autofocus | Phase autofocus | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 200 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.6 |
| Focal length | 85 mm | 65 mm |
| Sensor | n/a | Samsung ISOCELL HP5 |
| Sensor size | n/a | 1/1.56 (0.64) |
| Stabilization | Optical | Optical |
| Matrix | 50 MP | 50 MP |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.0 |
| Focal length | 16 mm | 15 mm |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
Front camera
| Matrix | 50 MP | 32 MP |
| Photo resolution | 8192x6144 pixels | n/a |
| Aperture | f/2.0 | f/2.4 |
| Focal length | 18 mm | 21 mm |
| Autofocus | No | Phase autofocus |
| Stabilization | Digital | Digital |
| Video resolution | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps | 2160p (4K) at 60 fps |
| TOF 3D sensor | No | No |
Connectivity
| Wi-Fi version | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax) | Wi-Fi 7 (802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be) |
| Wi-Fi features | - Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
- Dual Band - Wi-Fi MiMO - Wi-Fi Direct - Wi-Fi Hotspot - Wi-Fi Display |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 6.1 |
| Bluetooth features | LE | LE |
| USB type | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| USB version | 2 | n/a |
| USB features | - Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
- Charging - USB Storage Mode - OTG |
| DisplayPort | No | n/a |
| GPS | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
| NFC* | Varies by region | Yes |
| Infrared Port | Yes | Yes |
| SIM Count* | 2 | 2 |
| SIM Type | Nano | Nano |
| SIM Mode | Dual SIM Standby | Dual SIM Standby |
| eSIM Support * | No | No |
| Hybrid Slot | No | No |
| 2G Bands | GSM 850/900/1800MHz | n/a |
| 3G Bands | WCDMA 1/5/8 | n/a |
| LTE Bands* | LTE (B1/B3/B4/B5/B8/B19/B26/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B48/B66) | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
Sound
| 3.5 mm Jack | No | No |
| FM Radio | No | No |
| Dolby Atmos | No | n/a |
Other
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Announced | January, 2026 yr | April, 2026 yr |
| Release Date | January, 2026 yr | May, 2026 yr |
| MSRP ($) | 670 | 780 |
| Sensors | - Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
- Proximity Sensor - Gyroscope - Accelerometer - Ambient Light Sensor - Compass - Fingerprint sensor |
| Charger Included | Yes, 80 W | Yes, 80 W |
*
Attention!
Config, frequencies, NFC, and other specs may vary by region.
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Oppo Find X9s Pro the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0